Of course its a marketing campaign. Though MS marketing team should done a better job tbh. Now right before launch they will have a bunch of gamers complaining about not getting their free game.
DLC is like a double-edge sword.
Well we know its not going through development hell so thats good.
Regardless this is a good move for Slightly Mad. Beside there's plenty racing games for this gen to keep racing fanatics happy.
Middle finger to those who've been supporting XBL since its arrival and have yet to get a free copy.
I read one guy who said he been paying for XBL since Xbox days and have over 80K gamerscore and still have yet to get the free gift.
You would think the people who been paying for XBL since the beginning would be the first ones to get anything.
Army of Two was decent co-op experience.
I'm not sure what the hell SE is thinking. Adding multiplayer to these games will not make them better. Honestly they should learn from what happen with Tomb Raider. Some games just don't need MP. All that extra money can be put towards single player.
I hope this turns out false.
You can modify it so it can run google play. Check out the XDA forum
Its a bad move on Nintendo part. With new consoles just around the corner, the WiiU needs to standout. For the sake increasing value won't help your console sell better.
MS is a multi-billion dollar corporation I highly doubt the Kinect lead to the Xbox One getting lower specs. Not to mention it only takes 10% of system resources. If MS wanted to build a stronger system they definitely had the funds to do it. Why they didn't is a good of a question as any.
--
Why the hate?
- $499(higher in other countries)
- Kinect being force on users who more than like will leave it unplug/not use it.
- System is weaker than its...
Zenimax Studios would have more TES fans over if they had went the B2P route instead of P2P. Most people I've seen don't like the idea of spending $50-60 on the game itself then having to pay $15/month. Some question the $15 sub plus the addition of cash shop.
SE is in the same league as Sega. They will only localize games if they deem them profitable.
100 page slideshow isn't that bad I'm on 67 and I'm lov...hate it ><. This thing need to be split into 10 parts of 10 or 4 parts of 25.
One of biggest mistakes of his life.
Would this man done this even if he knew the game would be delay?
http://24.media.tumblr.com/...
In its current condition it would be foolish for Nintendo to charge for online usage.
However if Nintendo's online service were ever to come on par with XBL, PSN and their third party support was to get better, not charging would be a strong point for them.
He/she could just build their own pc and install the SteamOS on it.
I think its more they are going through development hell rather than cancel.
Most games that go through development hell tend to amass a hefty budget. That only result the game needing to sell more copies in order to make an profit.
You forgot kill franchise. Just look at MoH and Command and Conquer.
If it doesn't bring profit for EA than their interest dwindle.
When EA brought their year old games to the WiiU they should've sold them cheaper. Maybe that would've got more sales for them.
Just curious how did they piss you off?