Would it not be better to wait for a digital foundry comparison if folks care about frame rate and resolution so much? Surely PC is the way to go anyway.
I cant make my mind up if this is going to be awesome or awful. Ive never played a musoa title before and I get the impression it could get fairly repetitive and boring, however the more I see of this game the more awesome it looks.
Way too early to make statements like that. Its been evolutionary rather than revolutionary so far.
Oops disagreed by mistake. Sorry meant to agree.
Its gonna be Shulk.Yuichiro Takeda from Monolith Soft has retweeted the announcement of an announcement. Most of the time when they do this its because they have a vested interest eg Shulk is in Smah Bros.
Tbh Ubisoft have been very good in their support despite the Internet seeming to say otherwise. Zombiu was a release game, both recent Assassins Creed games were on it same time as other consoles with decent quality albeit black flag missed dlc. Rayman still launched at the same time as other consoles despite the delay with a free trial version to tide owners over which was great. Just Dance, while not a core game always makes its way over. Watch dogs is still releasing albeit late.
...
SMH why do they do this? Surely it must be further along in development than the others. Hopefully they do something cool with the extra time to make good use of the gamepad.
Yes the graphics look rubbish atm but daamn this game looks fun.
As was Zombiu...
Lol awesomeabe. Bubs up, funny.
Im a Nintendo fanboy and even I wouldnt have Hyrule warriors that high up the list. Its an experimental title which has potential to suck. It also has potential to be awesome but games like destiny, borderlands, bayoneta 2, sunset overdrive etc all look like nailed on great games therefore more anticipated than Hyrule Warriors.
No Donkey Kong? :(
Yeahbut they are also monsters that the characters keep in their pockets so it could still work on consoles.
Which didnt even make Kotakus insane list....goddamn were all about to be poor.
Yep and when/if it reopens itll cost $4.99, either that or there will be a demo one month before release.
Because its EA so y'know they're greedy, moneygrabbing shills who don't give 2 craps about screwing over gamers to make an extra few quid?
Maybe folks should start voting with their wallets?
Watch this space "pay $4.99 to beta test Battlefield Hardline"
They are bringing retro arcade style games back. Like when you have a timer running down to complete the level "Bad luck your out of time, to continue enter your credit card details and say 3 times" I love Satan" thanks for playing"
Awesomeness!!!!!!
Sensationalist flame bait. I actually partially agree with the premise of their argument as remastered versions of ps3 games which are already in HD seems like a cash grab to me but to say its a slap in the face to ps4 owners who bought it on PS3 is ludicrous in the extreme. Noone is forcing anyone to buy it. Although it will sell probably close to what it sold on ps3 because there will be a lot of double dipping.
Edit to add, you're spot on about the grammar too "...
See with things like this they should announce a "trade in your old copy and only pay a fiver for the updated one". I get that people love this game and for a lot of people double dipping is a no brainer but it still feels like a shameless cash grab to me.
Given its gone multiplat is it not pretty much a given that this wont stay console exclusive? Im not a PC gamer but lets be honest Activision know theyl make $$$ by putting it on PC so its a no brainer to me. When it happens, PC will be the definitive version.