a hit seeking one =D
up next:
ArmA II vs COD: BO
Fight Night vs Super Street Fighter
etc...
avatar to inception?
one is a big advert for 3D cinema with no real depth and the other is an actual movie with acting and directing =P
but I getcha quagm....stew...WTFDSD!?
"After openly admitting to giving away the copies of Max Payne he received for study"
no wonder he sucked in the movie...
You loved Max Payne?
as a movie?...or just because
watch more movies =| and play max payne
because if you love movies and/or max payne games, you'd loathe max payne the movie...its an insult to acting, cinema and videogames -____-
your opinion, jus saying, weird statement from a gamer/movie lover (if you are )
when you call an unreleased movie "gay ass" you know you're 12.
who on earth calls things gay in reference to its lack of quality anyway? so childish I haven't heard that since 9th/10th grade...and that was quite a long time a go
new rule:
if they have a pokemon avatar, they are probably a kid hijacking dad's PC.
because some people feel empowered and superior for suggesting the hamburger, no matter how irrelevant it is.
they might even suggest a hamburger when someone is in the mood jazz music, or going for a walk.
its a self-assertion thing...don't ask me how, I don't get it either...
Major - I agree
people have the right to sh*t on Apple, they've turned really big recently and everything big gets hated on, especially when they cater to a specific market and neglect others (price, design, style, etc)
however, to say that a Mac is sh!t is ignorant beyond ignorance.
I have good friends that a super tech nerds (and PC lovers), and they admit that macs have their strong points and weak points
a mac and a P...
I usually hate that use of IGN....since its over done and not always true
but in this very case, yes. IGN (and any other reviewer that basically LIED by stating the damage was incomplete) look like idiots right about .....
NOW
I see what you mean.
they judge the game based on the time they had with it, which can never be too long, but was obviously not enough to actually judge the game on its own merits.
the later reviews actually have better opinions (in general)
fact is:
GT5, its so big and so deep in content, most reviewers didn't touch on half of the stuff, and thus, the reviews were only for half the game
8/10 for half a g...
Yamauchi's (possibly indirectly) just owned all reviewers by putting SO MUCH content into one game, that all "rushed" reviews stuck out like a sore thumb
now I know reviewers don't have a lot of time to review each game, BUT, that is no excuse to rate a game with x content the same way as a game with 10x content.
you must really sink your teeth into a big game if you are to have a fair judgement of it.
sad but true
...
Various Guesses Charts
whats worst than PS3 or 360 fanboys?
COD fanboys...
whats worst than COD fanboys?
Treyarch/IW fanboys -________-
i don't doubt BO is better than MW2 (almost anything is)...but it scored less right? so that CANT be true /s
"AND they've taken so long to develop it, and it's still not perfect. "
quite the fool to assume it'd be perfect, no game is ever perfect. and the time it took to develop shouldn't effect the actual review.
you should look at it as is, not considering the hype or development time
thats one big mistake.
secondly, its an almost perfect racing sim for race and car fans, but not a great game, so I guess...
""This is the racing enthusiasts game. As a game on it’s own, it’s pretty average. "
eh? I'm confused...what everyone says then is...if you love racing and cars, the game is perfect, otherwise, its not...
right...so it isn't a disappointment...if you love racing and cars, which is what the game caters to.
lol...so confused
bobby kotick doesn't care if your PS3 version of COD sucks
you gave him money. now shut up
or get a 360 and satisfy his deal with Microsoft.
come on. This gen has been saturated with 9's and 10's
8/10 on my book = if you can, BUY THIS GAME.
its for wii only, but its good to see a proper disney game that isn't kingdom hearts =)
@ PS360 - exactly
people expect all "good" gaems to get 9/10, and if it doesn't, its a "flop" or its "ok"
so what, 7/10 is a crappy game? then whats 5/10? unplayable?! then wha...
next time PD should just release the premium cars
releasing the BONUS standard cars was a mistake, people will just focus on that and ignore the premiums
remember PD:
next time, don't give us more than what we need, or else we'll sh*t all over it because we rather do that than enjoy the game =|
Give up. People will always find something to sh*t on. Just leave it. We know the 200 premium cars are the MAIN cars, and the 800 bonuses but most people when they see 800 cars they want them all to have 6 months of work if done by only one person non stop...
you know...800*6 = 4800 months of work for the game to be completed...
i.e :
400 years...sure each car had more than one person, maybe a team of 12 people? it'd still take 33 years t...
what incentive do you want? big flashing numbers and a deep voice in the background screaming
"CAPDASTRO IS PWNING N00BS"
"KILLSTREAK CAPDASTRO IS THE KING"
"SUPER RACER CAPDASTRO IS GOD"
the incentive is the leader boards and the challenge against other racers, show off your skills, and your car, and to prove yourself to yourself and others through mastery of what seems to be the most complex controls of any racer.
how about:
ignore the whole agree/disagree system, its broken, both are retarded trolls, ignore them too
seriously, you know whats more pathetic than trolls? people that make a big deal and write a whole comment completely off topic about trolls.
-__-
here's some help:
http://www.pcworld.idg...