If developers charged more because of development cost then GTAV would have cost 200 dollars at launch. GTAV cost 265 million to develop. By comparison horizon was 47 million. Bayonetta for PS3 was ported by sega and not platinum... Should it have cost 10 dollars more?
Critics now say that skyward sword and twilight princess weren't as good as the 90's on metacritic seem to indicate. Nintendo nostalgia seems to wear off after awhile. Haven't played the new Zelda but horizon is awesome. Just platinumed it. So I am biased. But remember if you didn't like skyward or twilight they also got 90's on Metacritic. So keep that in mind if you're thinking about buying a switch for Zelda.
Jesus... We were paying 40 dollars for portable games and now all of a sudden cartridges (that look like 3ds cartridges) cost more to make. And people still defend this. Nintendo fans have Stockholm syndrome....
Because there is no games on switch. They can charge what ever they want now because there is no competition. Street fighter 2 is going to be 40 bucks!!! When rime comes out it will be the second best game on switch so the developers are gouging the gullible Nintendo fan base.
New super Mario bros 2 was a full proper instalment on 3ds, super Mario 3D land was a full proper instalment on 3ds. Monster hunter 4 was a full proper instalment on 3ds. Zelda plays optimally in portable mode, while the frame rate suffers in tv mode. The switch dock was conceived so they can charge full price for the games on their new portable system. They constantly cheap out on production value and people still are happy to pay full price... I don't get it.
When horizon 2 gets announced at a press conference we'll see how the audience reacts and their cheers will show us whether she's an icon or not.
And hopefully people come to the realization that you are now paying 60 bucks for handheld games...
Zelda runs worse in tv mode. Kinda makes it seem like tv mode is secondary to running in portable mode. Kinda makes it seems like tv mode is an excuse to charge 59.99 for portable games. If there was a Vita 2 the games would look as good as switch games but people would lose their minds if they charged 59.99 for their games. People need to wake up to this nonsense...
Don't see the need for killzone. Call of duty, battlefield, titanfall, over watch and battlefront have the FPS market satisfied. The sales haven't been close to the aforementioned franchises sales since killzone 2 so I don't think it's worth a new one.
But maybe as a third person shooter it would be worth revisiting the killzone universe. I am biased though as the only FPS I like is far cry and TPS are my favorite.
Everything exept Lumo is getting downloaded. Maybe when I find out what Lumo is I'll download it...
Legit good deal. 9.99 is a steal. People can not complain on price. No cheaper way (legally)to get access to that many games. I would pay for a month during a game drought period. I would be a full time subscriber if I didn't have new games to play. Would have loved this as a poor kid.
She was in sleeping dogs so she isn't against doing videogames. Would have no problem with it. Kinda imagining her as Meryl in the mgs movie for some reason now...
This switch wil self destruct in 5 seconds...
A Breath of fire turn based rpg with the Naruto ninja storm engine haunts my dreams. Love 4 and 5. Don't really care about the rest of the list.
"Being a hero while shunned by your tribe" is like Naruto's struggle as a carrier of the nine tails. Making me want the game more. 😄
The Wii outsold the PS3 and 360 by a large margin as well. Doesn't mean the console was appealing or had a vast selection of good games. To me. Hopefully my favorite developers don't waste too much money on games for the switch that won't sell. Like what happened on the Wii.
The wiiU didn't have third parties. That worked out...
A day one purchase for Nintendo fans only. Anybody thinking there will be more third party support than the wiiU is delusional. And console sales will not bring third party's. Just look at the Wii. If you're prepared to be given the same treatment game wise as the wiiU...by all means get the switch.
Should fallout dlc be free? Should call of duty dlc be free? I put about 80 hours into Ffxv. I put 15 hours into RE7 and there is paid dlc one week after release... FFXV isn't the game to go after to call out schetchy Dlc practices.
Puyopuyo Tetris is 10 dollars more expensive on switch. It must really be filling up that 32gb card...