Made me think of Review Tech USA and the idiot getting every single rumor about the PS5 debunked. XD
*walks to store*
"Give me an Xbox..."
"Which one? Xbox One S, Xbox One X, Xbox Series S or Xbox Series X?"
"Xbox..."
"Sir... I..."
"Gamespot said it's JUST CALLED XBOX! GIVE ME XBOX!!!!"
This is it boys and girls.
The big thing about a launch lineup is giving you a reason to buy the new systems. You will be able to play those games current gen. This article is saying it's "looking better" yet all those you can play without making the next gen leap.
These are all current gen games...
This is a remaster if anything. As much as I loved Sands of Time back in the day this is lazy.
It's a current gen game... It better be 4k 60fps...
And that's how they're gonna try to charge you $70 + microtransactions for a game...
Can't help but think a big chunk of those numbers are scalpers having a field day.
Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out. Maybe the purging of these supposed "game journalists" that worry more about click bait and finding everything offensive has started and we can go back to REAL gaming news.
I think the limited digital run sets a dangerous precedent. That will force a lot of people to buy the game out of fear of missing out inflating the numbers and opening a market for limited releases. You're basically forcing people to buy your product NOW. And let's be real, people are going to buy this game in droves giving Nintendo a fee pass to keep doing their anti consumer practices.
The thing is the title of the article says the remake has the same graphical style. Remake entails new assets. A port is using the original assets and just getting them to run on different hardware. So that title is just inaccurate and the complaint doesn't make sense.
It's a port.... Not a remake...
Putting games with upcoming PS5 sequels on Pc would be a great way to hype PC gamers into buying a console. I believe that was the strategy with HZD. However releasing brand new games to PC would hurt the PS5 sales and be against their best interest. We also have to see how PS4 games are enhanced on PS5. For example if Bloodborne got a patch to unlock framerate and visuals on PS5 it would revitalize interest in the game. I'm very eager to see what Sony's plan is going forward.
I agree. That's why I said a cheaper price or the same price with more storage would be push me to all digital. If the difference is something like $50 I might as well get the disc version.
I haven't bought a physical game or blu-ray in YEARS. I don't NEED a disc drive. Same as my PC. I don't have a disc drive in it cause I don't need it. So if I can buy a PS5 without a feature I won't use and potentially a cheaper price (or extra storage space) then all the better for me. Give the choice and let people buy whatever fits their needs.
If by "unlikely" you mean critically acclaimed, beloved, tried and true Playstation flagship series then yeah... Very unlikely. Smh.
An unpopular character from a game 20 years ago did not return for for a game that's almost a decade old except for a cameo and of course Kotaku got offended by this...
It's about choice. I honestly haven't bought a physical game in years. So if I can get either a cheaper system or one with an expanded SSD without the optical drive I'll take it.
Because they aren't forcing a Kinect on you anymore....