True, it beats every other card out so it may not have a feature that could possibly be used to make games faster but also introduces it's own set of latency issues and complexity to the rendering path.
What was the skepticism about again?
Not only that, but Pascal is going to blow PSVR out of the water with its new VR technologies.
http://wccftech.com/pc-vrps...
Unfortunately can't submit this article for approval because it paints Playstation accurately as a poor mans machine instead of making it the best. Website is too biased to get any real information across.
That's how I feel about Oculus. I already own a VR Ready PC and if Oculus is the same price as PSVR with additional camera and controller, I'll get the better one. Just tested the demo out at Best Buy and everyone was loving it.
http://wccftech.com/pc-vrps...
Educate yourself and try your hand again at originality because you have absolutely followed your name. Lol
Some one is super late to the party. The bigger question is who approved this article and let it through. That's more telling of the agenda.
Except that isn't true. Hitman shows little gain with async compute and Tomb Raider favors nvidia cards under DX12. Benchmarks? LOL have fun with those.
Hahahaha, another tabloid. This was already debunked weeks ago. PSVR will have the worst graphics and age very quickly. Oculus has the best price to performance ratio and largest support base.
Battlefront looked a bit too static. Character models where like manikins and the lighting isnt as good as in QB. Textures were detailed but very little tessellation.
Sli and crossfire rarely worked correctly so not a big deal unless you play for benchmarks. Go take your trolling elsewhere with your sky is falling, M$ is doom attitude. Killer Instinct runs beautifully at 4k 60 fps, Gears has played well and so has QB. Try regurgitating harder.
So who are they copying now to stay relevant?
Yes those PS4 VR games look like garbage. PS3 could render better graphics.
Luckily they have been doing that non stop.
I have and it doesn't come close.
Tron 2.0 was so much better. I'd like to see a reboot with all of today's technologie's referenced. I want to explore a (semi?) open world with white/red/grey/black hats populating it or their equivalent.
It's not that they love 30 fps, they just don't want to spend the ridiculous amounts of money these companies are charging for it. It's considered a premium standard set by GPU companies. Vote with your wallet.
Because that didn't work for Xbox. Playing the same game isn't enough for a good chunk of Sony players, they went with the PS4 for better graphics and all the 1080p articles. But now apparently the more powerful console is no longer an issue. Hmmm
If that is the case then more development time should have been spent on game breaking exploits and bugs. I wouldn't call that successful in the least.
If you dont have free time, this game is great for casuals because of the lack of content and balancing. You'll be limited to the bugs playing single player or Co op, and once you get to the end game material and pvp, they may have ironed it out.
Split their audience with what? Make some sense man.
The difference with Xbox owners is they are already well aware of the capabilities of their console compared to others. When a developer makes an upgraded version of a game, original Xbox owners will not cry foul. They are satisfied with their purchase and the graphical settings it comes with. They didn't buy the Xbox on the sole purpose of having a few more pixels on the screen. They purchased an XOne, because of Liv...
You should wait one more cycle. More cards are coming out that will have newer tech and be faster.