I love how you people are judging the game before any details have been even announced for it.
Guys have some faith, Bungie has a stellar reputation. Granted their main franchise is Halo, but it doesn't mean they are not capable of handling something different.
I'm interested in getting the book, is it worth reading?
Yeah rogue looks the most badass
You guys talk as if the story was simplistic, yet i highly doubt you can do better.
I think the storyline was exceptional. I dont know what game you are talking about, but it has a better story than most games these generation.
I played heavy rain and I am a teenager, and I loved the game. so what is this guy talking about
I disagree, the multiplayer combined with the new perks and abilities make it seem really interesting. However, I totally agree about the 8 player coop, that was an incredibly innovative feature R2 had, and I dont understand why it was removed.
Honestly, i've played the Steam demo, and the game is really disappointing online. It plays just like COD (killstreaks), with the exception of increased camping (because of stealth mode). I was thinking of buying this game for the online, but it seems i'm just gonna pirate it for the SP
This argument is no longer valid. WoW has really fast leveling now, and people can expect in a few hours to reach level 20, where most classes get interesting
He probably never had sex, or had a really bad experience. Or else he would never say that.
Imma pirate DA2 and Crysis 2, while I will waste my good earned money on the Witcher
Yes, no superhero game or even sandbox game on consoles has user generated missions. Imagine the re-playability. This could change how future sandbox games are made.
This is huge news. Now if you can't see that through your clouded fanboy judgment, god help you
WOW definitely pre ordering this game now
They probably did, its just not addicting.
@ Alpha Male
You're right about games like SOTC, and that a great single player experience justifies the price. However, according to IGN, the SP of this game isn't really special (and by what i've played of the demo, and seen on previews, I agree). Moreover, the single player is 5 hours! Yes that is incredibly short to justify paying full price for a game. Also, its not like this game is COD, where the multiplayer is incredibly addicting and versatile.
Crysis 2 hasn't even come out? How do you know how good it will be? And have you even played Bulletstorm, or are you just judging it based on what someone else says? How about killzone, did you forget that as well? GTFO troll
I bought flower for $10 on PSN, bulletstorm is full price. Plus, its not like bulletstorm is some kind of epic story adventure, it seems like just another military roid-rage shooter.
So yes, in this case, re playability SHOULD justify the overall score
Good review, makes sense. Although a game with a 5.5 re playability score should not be in the 8.0 score range.
booooooooooooooooooooobies.... .....
This list is missing The Witcher 2. Fail on your part Gamingunion.net