TK-66

Member
CRank: 5Score: 24070

What's innovative about Death Stranding? The closest I've come to an answer is someone telling me about the "like" system in the game, which sounds like Facebook rather than innovation.

2283d ago 3 agree9 disagreeView comment

Don't play the original. It's not worth anyone's time.

2284d ago 2 agree5 disagreeView comment

So if I look through your comments and find a few dumb statements does that make everything you say dumb?

Use some intelligence and learn to debate the points in the article.

2284d ago 10 agree25 disagreeView comment

@sprinterboy

You would lose your money. You're not an investor when you 'donate' to a project. You don't negotiate equity in the company when you donate. If that's a deal breaker to someone then they should never have donated to begin with, as it shows a lack of understanding in the process. People like that, in my view, deserve to lose their money in order for them to learn a lesson on how to sensibly handle their finances.

@sephiroth...

2284d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Probably because it was reviewed by a different person. Do you expect all the reviewers at IGN to have the same opinion?

2285d ago 9 agree2 disagreeView comment

@sprinterboy

"I still have no plans to purchase it OUTSIDE of maybe being able to critique it"

Is the logic of that sentence lost on you or are you just pretending to be stupid? Do you not understand that I'm saying I don't have much of an interest in it, but I might purchase and play it in order to offer a critique? Do you interpret sentences that literally? If so you've got this glorious gem in your own comment:

...

2285d ago 4 agree5 disagreeView comment

I think this was not expected at all by many of this games most dogmatic defenders. I still have no plans to purchase it outside of maybe being able to critique it, but this announcement did make me laugh a bit.

2285d ago 12 agree25 disagreeView comment

@UltraNova

It's called having the basic ability to actually communicate your point. Can't accomplish that? How pitiful.

2285d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

@UltraNova

You still struggling to learn how to support your own arguments? Let's see if you've learnt anything.

"Anyone with half a brain and 1 minute to spare to read some of your comments knows you are anything but impartial - you are biased towards a certain brand."

Time for you to use that big brain of yours and back up that claim, and I'll show you've pulled it out your ass.

2285d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

"I think their monetary system is a scam."

Let's start by addressing that. If you donate money to a project, and the project is still under construction and the people running it are still working to complete it, then you have no factual backing in your characterization. You can argue they're overpricing the content, but you can't claim it's a scam. You would need to provide evidence of dishonesty that can't in any way be misconstrued as incomp...

2285d ago 3 agree8 disagreeView comment

@Apocalypse Shadow

As expected you have no argument. When you're up against someone with no loyalty to any of the big 3 your entire position falls apart.

You've dumped money into a library you can no longer access. You've been played, but are too loyal to a corporation to admit it.

2286d ago 3 agree2 disagreeView comment

@Apocalypse Shadow

Incredibly your attempt to defend yourself has only dug you into a deeper hole.

"I don't like the idea of paying for online play. But the difference between the two is that Microsoft went about ten years from the original box and gave back nothing in return. No games whatsoever."

What did you expect? Them to give you a massage and a complementary fruit basket? Corporations dont care about you my dude. Gr...

2286d ago 10 agree12 disagreeView comment

Actually looks at the development history, and then concludes with a rational opinion? N4G ain't gonna like this one...

2286d ago 13 agree4 disagreeView comment

"But still no articles about Microsoft making gamers pay for XBL to play free to play games. Which is another thing, PS Now doesn't require Plus to play online. But you need XBL to play GP games online. Where's the articles about that too?"

Stupid Xbox gamers. I only bend over and open my wallet to play online games that I payed full price for/s

If you want to argue against having a paywall to access online games on console then be fucki...

2287d ago 30 agree20 disagreeView comment

ExClUsIvEs aRe ImPoRtAnT AnD gAeMrS AgReE!

2287d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Nice fluff piece. Slow news day I guess...

2287d ago 8 agree5 disagreeView comment

Calm down. Your comment has reached Pachter levels of stupidity if you're predicting this as "the beginning of the end" for gaming.

2287d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

@mr Plumblechock

Making one of the main characters of the game a sex worker is "to signpost one’s real-world political views"?

2287d ago 0 agree5 disagreeView comment

Better than shilling for a game to maintain your emotional stability lol....

2288d ago 4 agree7 disagreeView comment

@IamTYlerDurden1

"The acting, the world, the lore, the setting, the score/audio, the art, and presentation are what made it high brow."

How much longer are people going to spout this bullshit narrative? The story and lore is incredibly shallow, some of the worst level/enemy design this generation from a major publisher, and incredibly bland gameplay. Tell me hows the Lycans and Vampires are unique or worth any attention in The Order 1886. Even t...

2290d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment