Was it supposed to? and who said it did or would.
It's a subpar game, that didn't change anything for anyone, even at its original launch.
chill for a bit, people are just commenting on the rarity of a game backed by Sony being on GP again.
Does the same sentiment apply to PS+? Everyone lived Stray.
And Sony are developing 10 GaaS games....10!
I bet it's cool now lol.
The recent fact of Sony being afraid of gamepass is the reason the defense force is out so hard.
It hurts and they are afraid, just as Sony is worried as well. Sony themselves said MS is 60-70% of gaming sub services. Then there is the whole blocking games on GP, then there is the attempt to stop the A/B acquisition, they are most certainly afraid and scrambling.
Then we get to the awful moves they have been making, $70 games, 10 live service games in dev...
GP is obviously a threat to Sony no matter your spin. I like PS exclusives just like the next man, but I also like MS exclusives, which they do have as well. It just seems like the only argument people have in defense of Sony is...they have exclusives! guess what? so do all of the big 3 and in that case, it's a matter of preference, not everyone is into long-drawn-out similar cinematic Sony games, by the way, many are starting to pop up on PC as well. When you look at other features, serv...
Exactly this.
I think it's mostly a fear of the competition paired with some of Sony's recent terrible moves and backtracking this gen. behind the scenes Sony is on the ropes and is very desperately trying to catch up and find a new strategy that works, the whole 3-4 exclusives a year being their saving grace won't cut it this gen. There are so many ways for people to get and access 100s of games now, that people's attention is constantly jumping all over th...
What games are better is very subjective.
I am one all for bringing console games to PC. Sony has a wealth of good games waiting to be unlocked.
Now, I will say the sad part is hearing people say they are proud of Sony for doing this, when MS and other companies have been doing this for years. The writing was on the wall a long time ago... There was money to be made on PC. MS got flamed and we all recall all the "you don't need and Xbox or just the pure fanboy hate for MS everything on PC.
Wow, Sony is really afraid of this deal going through.
Wow.
Nice.
Now they need to add Dolby Vision.
The same could be said for any sub-service, GP, PS++, Sadia, Luna, and FTP.
Generally, they give you the base game and charge for expansions, but sometimes they give you the game of the year or anniversary editions, which do include DLC or extra perks.
I Finished ER on SX months ago, I am now considering buying it on PC. My son downloaded a Mod that allows him and his buddy to play the full game in full fledged online co-op!! They both were riding horses, no ghost form, no depleted health or flask and no fog wall on any dungeon/cave, and it's keeps track of both players progress. Amazing stuff, FS should make this happen natively!!
It looks amazing and I believe it's up to 4 player online co-op.
You can finish RE1 in 1hr.
No, just no.
Kratos looks like a drug addict, what's up with his body composition, with popeye arms?
No sir....I do not like it.
Hahaha, terrible game comparison.
But I'll bite! Control is miles ahead the better game overall.
I'm laughing so hard after watching this, It's amazing stuff!
And people claim Xbox doesn't have exclusives...suck it!!
It's not free, MS pays Ubisoft, and the gamer pays MS for the sub-service.
So UBI gets paid, then MS gets paid and then the gamer gets a product/service.
I get the whole supporting the Dev narrative, but it's kinda silly at this point to think that you or I know better than the big Corp like UBISOFT on their profit, expectations, or even how much they gained by making any deals with sub-services. Just think for a minute, UBISOFT supports sub-servi...
Huh? Can anyone confirm with 100% certainty that MS paid extra for more chips?
Second, this is the fastest-selling Xbox.
Third, They outsold Sony for like 3 months straight.
So I wouldn't say it did anything,
I'll finish your sentence...
"And in that department...Nintendo Rules!"
Like it or not, mass appeal, sales, and review scores prove this, no matter what little bubble some fans on here live in.
You should just say, "Hey Darthv72, you are correct and I stand corrected".
But instead, you spun your misinformation and included other factors to cover up your plainly obvious incorrect post.
SMH, be humble man, be humble.
First, it's not a good game.
Second, you seem a bit hurt by this to make such a comment.
Third, anger leads to the dark side. Try to relax a bit as I'm not seeing anyone on here making game-changing comments about this news, more so just commenting that another game Sony has a deep hand in appearing on GP.