Better results attained. The PS3 is the more far reaching console so the more efforts spent the better the games will be. Same cannot be said about any othe console.
That is a silly argument considering that the other analog stick opposite to the one pictured in your post is not in the "more comfortable position"...
Regardless of advertising. At this point, Sony's game lineup consists of so many great titles that any COD title just mixes in with the best of them. Sony has no need to push for titles like this anymore, they know that those who own the PS3 will ask for this game by name and by their current favorite console.
That game was great. It was underrated IMHO. If you like Bioshock, you should give Singularity a try.
Nuff said.
But that is because I have not been paying for LIVE since two years ago now. I have broken free from LIVE and play Xbox exclusives on the PC. I just don't see paying for online services when they are free everywhere else. Nothing against Microsoft, just my opinion that spending money for free stuff elsewhere is a bit silly.
It's the red district of trashy web sites. Sorry, but I find it hard to accept any news as viable media from a site that explores the world of hentia.
Much better.
This is a desperate attempt for MS to save some face knowing full well that they have lost one of their greatest third party exclusives. They bragged on this one for years and now it's gone. You can bet they will push for MGS4 on the 360 but from the looks of it, they will never see it much like the PS3 owners are now seeing ME.
I for one have never been fully impressed with the games. They're ok, just not every mans cup of tea.
The bug was not the worst part of that video... His driving on the other hand, that was horrible!
People are still comparing games by platform? Boy that is sooooo 2009.
It's hard to understand why anybody would pay for somethingthat should be free - henc why I can't understand the reasons for folks paying for Live so they can play games online.
Even if only 10% of the user base buy this service they will keep it going. It costs them nothing to discount the games and give free stuff away and so any person that buys the service is making them money. It's stupid to say this service will fail when it has already succeeded. I remember when all the nay-sayers said Home would fail and look where that is heading. People just need to quit trying to predict the future, it makes them look stupid.
Gee that's funny... I didn't know that you got 4 free games every month when paying for live... Oh wait, you don't? So psn is better the? I thought so.
It's funny to me how BF:BC2 was going to be the savior for those so upset about MW2. Now look at y'all... Can't just let it go.
Just asking...
Why is PSN+ better than live? Because I still don't need to pay to play online with PSN+. I think that's pretty simple if you ask me.
Heavy rain is extremely hardcore. To say otherwise shows you have not played it and know nothing about the game. Heck, heavy rain is far more hardcore than hitting a red ball or shooting with ones fingers... Pew, pew, pew...
"@N4gno
The ps3 has about 30 mb less ram than the Xbox 360 thats why 1 of the reasons multiplatform games look worse on the ps3.. Although they both have 512mb Ps3's OS takes up 30 mb more than the Xbox :)"
So you say it has less ram than the xbox but then show it does not then make an excuse that it uses 30 mb for the XMB that is not in use during game play? You're such an inigma. Oh, and third party games not looking as good on the ps3 is not a ram...