That's what's up, bruh. So what's your example of great look like?
Man, there's always that one who dismisses every great option for some arbitrary nonsensical reasoning. Meh....really? What's the last "great" game that you've played? Just want to see what your example of excellence is.
Man, happy gaming it's been a great year for it.
You know, Ghost, you do reserve the right to make your own list instead of griping about what's not on another person's list. Not sure if you were aware of that.
So basically make sure your favorite games impress this random guy on the internet. Got it.
Masterpiece? Really? You rode a horse between locations....the end.
That's because most people are willing to play what they actually pay for.
The real question is what is exposure worth if it doesn't translate into sales. Most GP subs are regulated to being and remaining as thrifty gamers. This means they'll spend more time waiting until the service provides the experience instead of stepping up to make the purchase. They're so proud that MS is willing to pay where they aren't willing to the same as a child would do. Now we have this empty narrative of engagement and exposure with no numbers showing sales transition...
Let not even talk about the horribly aged combat system, ugly graphics, pop in, and poor narrative; these are the things the "best game ever" is made of.
Really? Just think if the PC community shared in your sentiment there'd be masses of people who couldn't keep up with high end cards that wouldn't be playing. If GoW didn't look current gen enough for you, why not get a job at Sony and show us all how it's done. Let's go champ!!
Plenty of those "how is this possible on PS4" moments. It just seems as though people don't want to recognize the true talent Sony displays in their games. No one's talking crazy when a PC game can run on a high and low end graphic card. Why is there such an issue with Sony? There are games on the PS4 that can give current gen a run for its money and a few current gen games that don't make the cut. Let them hate because they'll find any reason at this point.
Agree all the way. It's on my list to platinum but I've not made there yet.
As every one of those games can be granted a sequel, there's no reason that Days shouldn't be on that list as well. I'm not sure if any of us have the ability to measure worthiness of any title in a company none of us manage. Just a thought
This guy gives off the typical basement gamer who's only opportunity for accomplishment is through videogames. How about you play it all the way through before casting any judgement. How many times have you died? What is an example of a unique zombie game since Days is so generic?
Listen, analogies and comparisons are a part of the English language no need to get but hurt over a video game. My views of the game are of little consequence and serve to change nothing that you may think. This is not a topic of complexity.
Putting down?? Not acknowledging an aged combat is far from putting down. Some people don't like the same things as you, sorry to break it to you. Calm down....
The demo puts the combat in every soul's game to shame I can't wait for the full release. Elden who?
While there are apparent similarities, the combat alone is so much deeper than Nioh. This is coming from an individual who deems Nioh 1/2 to be the best souls game to date, with only Sekiro coming in a close second.
I mean there are several games that are single player with season passes.
Paid for awaiting the pre-install. Playing 15, finally, so I'm in the FF state of mind.