Absolutely nothing, teraflop hasn't been a reliable measurement for years now and performance is highly influenced by a wide variety of other factors such as architecture and system bottlenecks.
There are tons of examples of lower teraflop graphics cards beating out those of higher ones, significantly at that. Instead of listening to marketing speak and acting like you know anything, you should wait for real world benchmarks.
VGChartz is neither a reputable nor reliable source of information, and numerous outlets have criticised it.
Nintendo are exploring the possiblity but recent news is that animal crossing will not support system transfer
I don't mind that as much, but giving players the option to have a shared Island or different Islands shouldn't be too hard to implement.
What worries me the most is the saving, as I plan to get a Switch Pro when they eventually come out 200 years from now, but I'll end up investing hundreds of hours into the game.
Some more math to show how much this is a scam...
Pokébank offers 3000 Pokémon storage for $5 a year.
Pokémon Home offers 6000 Pokémon storage for $16 a year.
Notice the issue? They've increased the price by over 3 times the amount of PokèBank, however they've only increased the storage capacity by twice as much.
And PokèBank was already being criticised for being extremely poor value for money, thi...
Each Pokémon takes up about 136 bytes of data, this hasn't changed in years and it's exactly how the Pokèbank ran.
For a premium $16 a year, Game Freak are offering 6000 Pokémon storage. This adds up to around 816kb in total.
Now let's be extremely generous and add about 25% to that to round it up to a megabyte. Google still gives 15,000 times that amount of storage for free. To every account. No strings attached.
Hell,...
I am a supporter of the Gamergate movement and I have been since the beginning.
I am tired of the clear corruption that occurs in the media regarding my hobby. I am tired of "journalists" trying to make me feel guilty because I'm white and I play games and plaguing the industry with irrelevant issues like gender representation, instead of actually working towards building yourself content in the market and showing other demographics exist.
But m...
That's because half the roster is REALLY pushing for it.
90% of this roster have never had an Xbox exclusive game, and ones that have are from either a series that only ever released one Xbox exclusive game (Jet Set Radio on the original Xbox) or from a single Xbox exclusive that the general public would never know about (Grabbed by the Ghoulies, Kameo)
I mean the majority of Sony All Stars roster was bad and in extremely poor choice, but this is even worse.
I can see where you're coming from and to an extent I can agree with you.
But here's the thing, I've owned every single Nintendo and Sony handheld. I have played so many Pokémon games, so many Mario games, so many Zelda games that it's unreal.
I've been playing multiple titles every single generation. So when the selling point for the next Nintendo system becomes "Mario, Pokémon and Zelda" it's like "so what?".
But the Vita has an extremely strong library with more new, first party experiences than its rivals and has some amazing online social and gaming capabilities.
As someone who's owned every handled the Vita is arguably my favourite.
This is not a glitch, this is not a pricing error.
This was for several regions, across several games, each with regional pricings. This was for demos that were months old and had no need to change the prices.
You can maybe slip up and do a single game across a single region, or perhaps one fixed price across multiple regions. And that is mainly only for new games, or games that actually have a price tag to manage.
When you change several games, that have alwa...
Reddit? No, this wasn't reddit. This was on 4chan at least 24 hours ago.
And it was confirmed fake on that thread.
If I'm told something is exclusive, it should be exclusive. Timed exclusivity is not true exclusivity and should be mentioned.
Calling it is exclusive encourages people to buy the system for that game - If it then comes out on alternate systems then people's choices have been influenced wrongly. This is false advertising
In any other industry this would be illegal. Why is this not illegal for the video game industry?
Slight is an understatement, and it's more than that.
MAJOR graphical downgrade and removal of effects found within the initial build. Ubisoft's next reveal we can expect the same.
Then a severely bugged game that's running completely awfully on a standard PC. Have you not even seen the metacritic user reviews? I know you can't trust metacritic as a legitimate objective source anymore, but the majority of the community is upset with this game.
...
The real question is, will anyone buy it after what happened with Watch_Dogs?
Haha, some of these comments are adorable.
Blindly siding with mainstream reviewers who are giving high scores and crying when other people's opinions differ.
May I remind you that there have been a large number of cases with publishers bribing reviewers, and even reviewers getting fired for giving bad scores. Why on earth would you trust mainstream review sites?
I don't know if this is sarcasm or not.
If it's not, PCs can actually last longer than consoles. Furthermore, upgrading it only requires you to upgrade like, one or two components to still outperform the next generation that will arrive, meaning you can then beat the next gen for half the price using your existing build.
Whereas in 6-7 years time, you've got to buy an entirely new system compared to a single CPU, Graphics Card.
Do none of you know what AAA means anymore?
AAA was meant to be a high quality game, best of the best. Following this logic it's entirely possible for indie games to be AAA (Journey, for example).
Now AAA only means high budget, high profile. This does not mean these games are necessarily good.
Falcom, for example, is a low budget, low profile game company... Selling 400k would be a dream come true to them. They hit a niche.
Yet they're older t...
Your arguments made no sense, especially the whole "they'll patch it!" attitude.
The game has been in development for 5 years AND and delayed - It shouldn't NEED to have patching to fix some glaringly obvious flaws. The videos and photos Ubisoft have released to the public have been controlled, altered to look and run better than the game itself.
The webms I provided are raw gameplay footage.
"It's gonna be kick ass!" And "...
A good example, AMD 9.75TF Navi RX57XT is 14% more capable than the 13.7TF RXVega64.
Don't blindly listen to marketing speak.