"PS3 owners are better at video games. The 360 player clearly received more damage during that battle."
you make an idiotic statement like this then have the hypocritical nerve to call other people fanboys? what a jerk.
as for the video, i see no difference though i don't think this is at all a good representation. but everyone seems to agree this is nothing like the differences from bayonetta, so who cares? either way you're getting practically the same...
funny how when it's any other game or just a general gamer, you all immediately goto crazy. but when it's wow, you act like it's suddenly less the person and more the game. i don't get it.
i would love to see how much different the comments here would be if they didn't say this was a video from the 360 version. i bet most of you didn't even watch the right video. looked pretty good to me. nothing amazing, but nothing as bad as some of you are saying.
too tall needs to be stripped of his bubbles because he doesn't agree with your point of view about a game? he wasn't harsh, he wasn't rude, he merely expressed his opinion. and you think that means he shouldn't be allowed to talk? thank you for perfectly expressing the mentality of the majority of this sorry community. how pathetic. tootall, bubble to you to help compensate for all the bubbles you will probably lose for calmly expressing an OPINION!
i agree with your numbers. if SC2 hits this year, it would def end up giving Reach a run for it's money. as for the other predictions from everyone else, if you believe that, that really is a reach.
is that blizzard is basically doing this completely randomly for anyone with a battle.net account. That really doesn't seem to be in their best interest. i mean do they really want little kids who's only knowledge of blizzard is a night elf beta testing a game they know nothing about? would have made more sense to target the starcraft players since we're the ones who'd have a far greater grasp of the balancing.
as for ppl paying 300+ to get in...that's not even a little surpri...
it bothers me that people compare that sub par re-release like it's something special when it's the same game they've been churning out for 4 years now. if you like it, great. i have lots of friends who love COD. but to say it compares to the greats is just silly. would you really lump twilight in the same category as god father, or casablanca, etc...?
that's basically what's being said when people act like COD is anything but a generic shooter. as i said, it's designed comp...
didn't make me paranoid. just reaffirmed my belief that pieces of entertainment that do best are usually the biggest pieces of crap. Yeah it sold a lot..because it appeals to a certain type of "gamer." and that type of gamer is, unfortunately, the most common kind. the kinda that believes himself (or herself) to be a 'hardcore gamer' but really all they are is a chump that needs a game that allows you to get kills with one or two bullets and lets you memorize the best camp spots....
I call for non-generic shooters and some unique franchises that are worth a damn. Blizzard is your saving grace because without them, your company is trash.
while i do agree that master chief is a badass, this is the most poorly written and unfunny article i've read in a while (and on n4g...that's saying something). how did this get approved?
that mastered the online console shooter craft though. sure the campaign didn't come close to CE, but the Halo 2 multiplayer design has been basically copied by every other console shooter since.
was the first thing i thought of too. I played that game so much in 2008 and have been looking for an excuse to play through again. trophy support is just what it needs.
so...what? it'll be 3 hours long? hard to get much smaller. but hey, there's still at least 4-5 million mouth breathers that will continue to prove activision can screw over the consumer and get away with it.
