Some of these games just came out a few weeks ago, and they're already discounted?? I wonder what's wrong with the gaming industry. Is it really going south?
Cannot wait. =D
Sony needs people to buy Playstation plus and the only way to do that is with these kinds of services. Free games alone isn't going to do it.
It was on the exact same thing. Though it looks like his is missing too now. Wierd.
They made Clive Barker's Jericho??! WHAT? I did not know that.
Plus there's a clue on the Rockstar site (some fanclub thing) that shows Niko Bellic's plane ticket stub for San Andreas.
But i hope it's not the only place you can find them.
Are they serious? Those looks pretty close to real PSPs btw.
If it wasn't for PSLS's leak. I'm sure Yoshida was PISSED. But it grabbed a lot of positive attention for Sony. I sure hope we get a playable demo sometime soon.
We begged for Trico news, and ended up getting a lot more than we asked for. God knows how they got that video. Bribes? Break-ins? It was funny seeing IGN completely ignore PSLS though. They did an impressions article of the video the day it was released. Destructoid was pretty angry too. =P
0_0
Well in that case the Destructoid video means nothing. I thought this was all about a bunch of rumors. But if PSLS reported facts...
Maybe that's why they were so desperate for news.
I hope it's all true. ^_^
Dennis Dyack isn't allowed to go there, and even IGN (the biggest game site out there) can't have its URLs posted on that forum. Neogaf's a joke, hehe.
Someone's copying PSLS...
o_o
But PS2's EE chip is as powerful as a Pentium 4 running at 3.2 Ghz in terms of floating point processing. It's because the EE is actually 3 cores: 1 primary, 2 secondary. When programmed correctly, it acted like a 900 Mhz chip.
The Xbox had two advantages, which was a larger (but slower) memory pool, and a really awesome GPU. If you look at MGS2, which was ported to Xbox, it looked cleaner and had better anti-aliasing than its PS2 counterpart since the PS2 GPU sucked. But it also...
There were huge teams involved. Also, Cell as 9 cores in total, all running at 3.2 Ghz. PS3's version of Cell has 8 cores in use.
The SPUs were benchmarked, and a single SPU can outperform a G5 Core (3 in Xenon) by an order of 3x~10x depending on the task.
The IBM engineer was talking about how one component of the two chips is identical. Big whoop. It made sense business-wise to use the G5 core since IBM had already spent so much money on it. But Cell’s just way more powerful, which is why IBM always showcases Cell being 50x faster than a G5 on its own.
Just take a look at the games. PS3 games are almost a generation ahead of 360 titles in terms of graphics, physics, AI, and even storytelling in a few cases. Killzone 2 is amazing...
So this whole 3D thing is happening 5 years too soon?