not a single worthwhile game on that list. maybe if it were 3 for 1 i'd consider it.
which is why i said they should take them outta the game. no sniper rifles. not leave the sniper rifle in there and then run in the middle where the ppl with real skill hang out.
snipers are noobs in every console game i've ever played. as soon as you get on em, they're done. they rely on you being distracted by someone else (that actually has some balls) to get the kill.
in every game that likes to brag about its physics on console, sniper rifle...
you're outta your mind. you don't find it pathetic that the best looking game came out 3 years ago and nothing has touched it since?
i see why THQ is saying this though. This is a company that has NEVER been known for pushing the tech. They lag behind everyone else, so OF COURSE they would feel this way. if the generation leaps slow down, they get more time to get caught up.
maybe you're all satisfied with our favorite industry becoming stagna...
they should just take sniper rifles out of FPS all together. nothing says coward like a noob in the corner sniping ppl while everyone else is getting their hands dirty. learn 2 play
i realize it's easy for ppl like you to accuse to diffuse the point into obscurity.
i never demanded proof...YOU DID. don't try to turn anything around. so immature. YOU demanded proof after his comment. i simply said, how hypocritical for you to demand proof without providing any. how you turned that around in your head to justify your point is way beyond me. wait, n/m. you're a fanboy...and fanboys circumvent the use of logic to meet their desired ends....
saying that you dislike a company (like so many sony fanboys do) because RRoD is such a huge problem while simultaneously forgiving the other company for doing the exact same thing FIRST is kinda silly...in fact...it's down right hypocritical. but then again, fanboys are nothing if not hypocrites.
also, you can't ask a person for proof then not provide any yourself. you say RRoD eclipses ps2 failure rates and yet you offer nothing while asking for him for everything...
that's good news. but the fact that this game is basically a slightly improved redo of fable 2, adds nothing new, and is way too easy and short gives me several more reasons to rent (if that).
LOL...never make the mistake of thinking these "gamers" can't be in denial.
at any rate...the best system of all time is the super nintendo.
as for the ps2...good system...sure. great system...hardly. ppl LOVE to criticize the 360 for the RRoD. no system has ever had a failure rate like the ps2 (although i'm sure i'll get a million disagrees from the same gamers-in-denial - only a MS product can be poorly made...not a sony product...t...
you mean the sequel to a VERY crappy game turned out to be crappy? i'm shocked!!!
"Lionhead Studios has once again brought a masterpiece of a game to the Xbox 360 console."
as soon as i read that, it became clear the author has no interest in being unbiased.
i played both previous fables, and while they are fun (although short and nowhere near as deep as lion head claimed they would be), they are not great games, and certainly not unmatched.
fable is a good series, but come on... reviews like this deserve no cred...
lol...yeah, imma mention any other games i think deserve to be on there and run the risk of being nailed by the trolls (i'm already taking a risk just by saying ODST wasn't so bad).
the point i was making, and am still making, is that you have a list of 6 titles that are disappointing. when there are probably a few hundred that could make it on the list, you just stuck to 6... how did you arrive at these 6? i mean look at all the games that have been terrible. Ava...
i think it'll be alright. no high end ps3 exclusives got slammed.
i semi disagree with ODST. it definitely wasn't worth 60 dollars, but we got almost exactly what they said we would. Pretty sure bungie wanted this game to be sold like an expansion and MS got in the way of that.
at any rate, this list could have been MUCH LONGER. just some blogger desperate to keep his job so he had to shovel out some junk article.
beat me to it
then she wakes up and gets raped by smurfs. very unexpected ending
the more desperate people are to share their opinions in these comparisons, the more obvious it is that they know they are wrong.
damage control... or... spin
you don't have to play it. i wish Call of Duty would die a horrible horrible death. but you know how i deal with it...I DON'T F*CKING PLAY IT! a crappy company over producing a crappy game year after year will never get a cent from me.
at least wow provides you with some level of diversity. there's a reason no other MMO can come close to dethroning it.
totalps3fanboy had his comment hidden for trolling and yet he has more agrees than disagrees. you people (ps3 fanboys) are sad, pathetic people. go play one of those many amazing exclusives you've got this year (can't think of any off the top of my head, but i heard about so many).
as for the comment made by Rare. yeah, put a 6 year old in front of a computer and he'll probably know more about it than most of us. i realize that rare hasn't been in touch wi...
cuz motion gaming should have died with the wii.
notice nintendo is hardly even utilizing it now...even they know it's cheap gimmick.
i hope this doesn't divide up the Reach community. i guess since they are using the same engine, it could be like ODST where it worked with Halo 3 for the multiplayer.
Hope this means we get all the original Halo maps like Hang em High, Battle Creek, Rat Race, Prisoner, and SIDEWINDER!!!
i knew somebody would call me out for my statement and mention those exact 3 titles.
Fable 3 = Fable 2.1
Medal of Honor = COD clone = clone to a game i couldn't care less about
Star Wars = The sequel nobody asked for to a game nobody liked.
i'll pass.