they did that on purpose!
have you ever seen a purple rune?
The environments look good, but the enemies look textureless and most definitely dated.
Well that's why I'm saying gamers need to be aware, if enough people drop it then it can definitely make a difference. You're right it's not that simple, but my point is that if we're going to complain it's "anti-gamer' now we still have to do something about it, so that awareness is always there. At the end of the day video gaming is a hobby and people will go for what has the best value to them. The best way is to promote exactly what you're doing, get G...
Currently it the BEST thing for gamers. We always complain about value and expensive DLC and overcharging microtransactions. Well for once we as gamers are getting SO many games at the most ridiculously low prices in gaming history. It pays for itself.
What gamers need to understand is that when it starts to go against us DROP it. It's a subscription, we can unsubscribe when we start getting unsatisfactory content or policies.
wow some of that vegetation looks incredible realistic
Loving it so far. All this game needs is content and it could be the best multiplayer experience out there.
The Gears 5 campaign was underrated, and the Hivebusters expansion was one of the best co-op experiences I had. Simply epic. Can't wait to see what they do with UE5.
Oh snap does it say Gamepass? Hot damn and anotha one!
I think the pricing should reflect the objective value and competition. I hate to compare it to Xbox and Gamepass because it turns into a bias fanboy flame war but PS5 games are already $10 more that the standard $60. I'm sure many people will have no problem with $10/month (or $18 monthly), but again objectively speaking value isn't there. Gamepass owners know for sure they will get ALL MS published games day 1, on top of that it adds plenty of third party games day 1, includes PC ga...
There is a multi-billion dollar company giving us day 1 exclusives on their service. It doesn't make you entitled to expect the competition to do the same, it's not unreasonable. That's literally how industry expectations are determined, otherwise expecting to pay $2 for a piece of candy is "entitlement". You sound like want Sony to rip off your fellow consumers so the CEOs can have fatter stacks in their pockets when they're already charging almost $100 a game, I di...
Hard to hear you over a ridiculous library of Day 1 game and $180 for a year 3 subscription. What kind of idiotic world do we live in where multi-billion dollar corporations giving good deals to consumers is a bad thing.
The pricing is not good. You pay extra for backwards compatibility and there are no guaranteed day 1 games. I hate how much PS rips us off because people just take, not as bad as Nintendo though.
Because the frustrating and master class are referring to two different things. Master class is referring to the world building.
Loved that game!
This is so random, there are zombies in Stranger things now?
yep I'm not expecting anything and don't care that much, it's just funny how much blatant milking there it
Unless you're talking about the exact same reviewer making the exact same conflicting points about the two games you are just reaching deep. There are hundreds of reviews and opinions out there, even on the same site reviews are often done by different people with different opinions. Maybe the shaky performance is overshadowed by other parts of the game being beyond great.
They couldn't be bothered to add some story content after a decade of 3 damn remasters. How many times will people keep repaying for this??
Indeed looks incredible!