I never said it was. I don't know how the game is, because I've never played it. But when the review cites pros such as "Varied, enjoyable weaponry, assured shooting gameplay, and darty, nippy plot pacing" and cons such as "repetitive action and dodgy grenade mechanic" does the game really deserve a 24 point deduction?
Well, the Wii had more interesting games revealed for the first time for it. I can't really think of many games that Sony or Microsoft revealed... Cliffy's game which glitched out, MGS for PSP, FFXIV, and that awesome-looking PS3 racing game. They're going to be good, I imagine.
Also, Recon and Kojima's 360 game, but those weren't really shown. That's like saying Zelda.
I don't understand how it gets a 76/100 when, in the review, the pros BY FAR outweigh the cons.
What are you talking about? When did Nintendo ever go after daycares? The Disney stuff is true, but Nintendo? I've never heard of that. Please back yourself up with some sources.
"It’s also worth noting that the game has not been, and will not be fully localized. Rodgers mentioned that while text and menus are all in English, the Japanese voice work will kept. This is due to the fact that they knew, no matter who they hired to do vocal work, players would complain about the “poor English vocal tracks”."
Dammit. Am I the only non-weeaboo gamer? I want english. I don't care about voice acting. Bad voice acting > foreign voice acting.
Of course, no mention of Muramasa or Little King's Story. Sigh.
I can understand how it would be unnecessary for what they're trying to do, but... For it to just "not work"? That kind of worries me.
You mean "Puu"
The group that seemed the most defeated, ironically, was Nintendo. They were so lacking of life. I felt that Sony was the fullest of life. Their speakers were fantastic. Of course, the only speaker that had a bit of trouble was the guy showing off Sony's motion controller. But after awhile he got into the groove of things. Sony showed off the most interesting stuff, and I don't see how anyone can be saying that Microsoft won.
Sony's motion looked neat, and will have uses. Microso...
Why should we pick up FFIV? FFIV was the only FF game I could ever get into. But it's gonna cost around $32 to get all of the episodes. So $32 to get the full game. Yeah right.
Why not just let Retro do the whole thing themselves? They'd do 10x a better job than Ubicrap.
They started working on Red Steel 2 when motion plus was announced, way back in like mid July or something. So the game is gonna be released a little over a year after they started working on it. They're coming close to the end now, and yet it still has a ton of major flaws. I've lost most interest for this game. If they have the technology to do 1:1, why not do it? Because Ubisoft. That's why.
Most of the self-proclaimed hardcore -- the loud ones that whine on the internet about Nintendo sucking -- started gaming this gen. So Nintendo never lost them to begin with.
Protip: This gen is current gen. Not next gen.
The more you know.
I think the "achievement" type things were done very well in Wario Land: Shake It! and Metroid Prime 3. They actually netted you stuff for completing them.
The in-game achievements of Mega Man 9 were done badly. They should've unlocked stuff we instead paid for with the DLC. Still, I completed all of them. Damn completionism :(
This is quite possibly the dumbest comment I've ever read. 'grats.
I don't even understand how anyone can say Microsoft won. They did a bit better than Nintendo, in my opinion.
Sony won hands-down. Their motion tech was the most impressive, and most importantly, didn't flip out and break at ALL, they showed more than just multiplat games, and their speakers were confident and likable (except the guy showing off their motion system, but only for a little while).
Microsoft's conference was pretty much a disaster. The only redeeming pa...
Who cares? Give us Amaterasu already. Okami needs more representation.
I love how Gears of War, Halo, Metroid Prime, Half-Life 2 & episodes, Uncharted, whatever, all do this, but when Mario makes a copy&paste sequel, the crap hits the fan. I think it's someone complaining just so they can complain. The first Mario Galaxy had so many different, varied environments. If the second one also has varied, new, different environments, how could you call this foul?
I heard Reggie say that this is more of a core game than the original Galaxy was... th...
I dunno, from what I've seen Sony's purple dildo looked more accurate than Motion+.