It WILL be 399$. That's it.
Been saying this for months. No way it is costlier than 399$..uh uh. All this price speculation is ridiculous, just think this thing logically.
Thank you for introducing some sense.
Scorpio and Pro were not a make or break console. Everybody knew Pro won't / can't outsell PS4, and the same goes for Scorpio. PS4 and XB1 are still where the real jam is, and the trend set by them till now will continue to deepen till the gen ends.
@shadowknight ;
MS lost money througout X360 days.
I don't think they will hesitate THAT much to gain a leg up from Sony.
Did we have figured out which of the 3 timelines this game falls in and where ?
Would love to read speculations.
IIRC Japan region and Asia region is different.
Actually even on IGN's Podcast Unlocked Ryan asked Phil about the showing of Scorpio some earlier than E3...and he didn't ruled it out. Ryan seems to think there was a good chance it will be shown before E3, but nobody expected this early I guess.
The writer did said he was interested in expanding the books with this newfound fans he found.
But I would love a Witcher game without geralt and everyone but in the universe.
What a glorious day 1st of April is.
Anyway, no way in hell there will be Batman game coming.
Whether any company says this or not, the "support for forseeable future" is always assumed as per companies track record.
if Activision says so, don't be much optimistic. If Blizzard says so, it means they will support it 5-12 years atleast.
It is.
Regardless of these pathetic people, it should be really really REALLY unforgivable in freakin 2017 for Nintendo to have yet again a supply constraint.
I mean why on earth 95% of other hardware manufactures predicts this right and Nintendo famously has..Never?..had satisfied supply to demand ratio.
Looking forward to a Switch launch in India in mid-2018 IF EXTREMELY LUCKY. just wtf.
It'd be okay if Xbox was coming with 4 new IPs and said Scalebound which was costing them (say ~60M$) and not much returns, but daamn when you have nothing you need to have these things.
It's not called "it won't make profit so we won't release it", in terms of future investments which IS going to bite them in the ass, they should have go ahead with it even if they were just breaking even. It's called Investment.
HA! This is ridiculous, I mean these cases wh..
*reads he is suing Konami*
hmm...I am a little bit conflicted now. =/
Exactly.
If Zelda wouldn't increase WiiU sales than what will.
I blame MS' ability to greenlight new IPs. They need to start like yesterday to even think to making up the gap.
Ryse Son of Rome - Not good.
Titanfall - Awesome!, but didn't sell for some bizzare reason
Sunset Overdrive - Good-ish
Quantum Break - deeply flawed. Not good.
Cuphead - looks amazing but not a system seller which MS needs now
Ori and the Blind forest - undisputedly most amazing new IP on XB1
Plus + Internet speed in my country suck so physical all the way.
It shrinks my heart everytime I come across Titanfall news.
Because it makes me think how this one franchise that IS good is just treated to one bad luck to another.
Too early obviously for TF3, lets hope they can revitalize TF2 and roll back some MP changes.
Well depends upon the definition of shortly after.
For an RPG 20-40 hours seems about right, but for some even 10hours for 60$ is worthwhile.
This vid will make everything clear.
https://www.youtube.com/wat...
Crowbcat
I hope so.
Though many sites, including Eurogamer and Gamespot has revealed that as of now the game is a glitchy mess.
Better of waiting for reviews and bugs to fix out if there is any indication of this going south.
As opposed to what ?
Only making 1FPS, 2 TPS and a side scroller like their competitor.
I could have exerted some more effort into this comparison but literally everybody know Sony has much much more diversified genre games than its competitors. PERIOD.