It is confirmed that nintendo has been looking at microsoft online and wondering how to make something like it if not better. We'll see if they follow through.
Never post that poll on N4g unless you want whatever sony option to win by an unbelievable margin. Results skewed and thusly significance has been removed.
IGn knows NOTHING!
Nintendo isn't that concerned. 3ds will make everything all better.
I don't see it in the gameplay.
Good idea perhaps, If executed on a game that doesn't just look meh.
Damn good year that's fer sure.
Looking at that logo it look like spike knows what the vga's are all about now....
Being totally gay,
I doubt it, It would take quite a while to remake a game from the ground up for ps3. Patcher seems to make it sound like noone has even started this project. I expect that even if ps3 owners do get the game it will be about 2 years before we see it, less then that and ps3ers would get a buggy mess seeing as they basically have to rebuild the entire game from the ground up. The unfortunate fact is if they gave the game the time it deserves... would it even be worth it?
In 2 ye...
We need a top ten list for this!? You only need one reason, girl gamer will both respect and participate in your gaming time. End of article.
My guess is it's going to be a monumental failure and never come out. Mostly because of all the proprietary graphics tech in a ps3. If developers are still having trouble negotiating the difficult hardware in a ps3... god help the pirating community who attempt this.
on the positive side if they ever could get that kind of thing to work. Then move might not be as completely ridiculous and useless anymore.
it just bothers the hell out of me to see that after all this wait, the frame of the vehicle and mechanical system is still invincible and you still can't truly demolish these cars. Not to mention Apparently even when you do unlock damage, you have to pay for repairs to the car if you want to try the feature out.
This is why race sims suck.
Silly UK car sluts. Of course they will love it thanks to top gear. That is... until they try to enjoy the crash physics.
The fact that damage is so bloody limited makes for fail.
wait... so not only do they make actually damaging your vehicle something you have to work like hell to access. But when you do damage a vehicle they punish you by charging you for repairs. Plus even with the highest damage mode competitors don't get damaged, just you do.... PS3 users just got a massive middle finger after 6 years.
I was under the impression that this game was going to revolutionize game car crashes in perfect physics using the cars actual construction. ...
Am I the only person bothered by the source of this information?
it comes from what appears to be one of those, "sign up for 5 subscription plans and get 13 people to do the same, you get a "free" [insert tech gadget here]" sites.
If anything it proves more morons want a 360
most of the negative reviews i've read are less bitter about the damage aspect and more about you are given all the cars that are perfectly emulated and the racing is boring. I don't like slowing down to a crawl for every turn under the risk of spinout. I think reviewers felt the same way. It's everything you ever wanted in a car game except for fun.
Good year to own a wii i see. Core gamers rejoice with your wiis for the last time before you become obsessed with 3ds.
Here's how i see it right now
MW1>MW2>Goldeneye>Bl ack ops
It will likely support 3d gaming and be in HD easily. But you know that wouldn't be THE innovation nintendo will offer with the new system. It should be interesting to see what nintendo will have planned. I predict next e3 we're going to know a lot more.
To tell the truth, i'm fairly sure it's just 10-20 individuals who just have a million accounts and are ip spoofing up the wazoo. These are the sad people with no lives that gives this site almost no credibility sometimes.
Perfect example, how many disagrees i've gotten on my earlier statement in less then 20 minutes. That's probably just one sad, sad, guy who did at least 4 of those disagrees.