Okay, when you literally have to say "this is bad because this wouldn't happen in real life" to find flaws in a video game, you know you're reaching hard.
Elena's been helping Nate since Uncharted 1. Her being able to run through a jungle and use a gun is nothing new.
Rafe and his people beat Nate and Sam to certain places frequently. They were waiting for him in King's Bay and Libertalia,
And finally: nothing...
Because enough completely conflicting reports of what they are and what their purposes and capabilities are exist that it has to be true, I guess?
@Surt
...what?
What about her wasn't a real villain? She was still killing people to get at this treasure, because someone paid her to. She's a merc. Just because she wasn't as insane as Rafe and didn't stick around to obsess she's somehow "redeemed" and not a "real" villain?
Get over yourselves.
Oh my God a female character being good at fighting isn't some sort of feminist conspiracy.They don't have to give Nate and Elena one of each child to "appease" anyone. And that kind of FREAKOUT is completely unwarranted and I'd toss his butt too even if I agreed with him.
Some of these people are getting as bad as the SJWs, yeesh.
If Burger King were a division of a larger company and wanted to continue to maintain funding or needed to increase it, yes.
Spin is simply trying to turn a negative into a net positive. You're being outsold by your competition? Point out how your overall performance is still up. Your numbers are down from last month and someone else's are up? You spin that by pointing to more consistently high performance, much as Sony did in the months MS would occasionally outsel...
Yes. It's an attempt to spin the news your competitor is beating you into a positive for your company. That's literally what spin is and something every company, at some point, does.
Literally anyone on the BGST Podcast.
Last month we had R&C and MLB, this month Uncharted and a TON of multiplats, next month we have No Man's Sky and Star Ocean 5...
Stop the nonsense, bro.
How did this get approved? It's a literal clickbait article. The title gets you to click and then there's literally nothing inside.
It's like what those sketchy Facebook pages use to push fake "news" about movies, games, and the like.
They do let ND do what they want. The folks there have said many, many times that they have quite a lot of creative leeway.
This game though. <3
How did it not "stay true to it"? Warfighter was a great continuation in terms of SP, just a shame we won't get to see how that story ends.
I wouldn't say it was satirical in any sense. But it was definitely not a proper review, almost to the point that I question if he even fully played the thing. Nothing on mechanics, nothing on any of the supposed flaws, just an angry "This series and everything about it SUCKS!" and that was it.
That said, I doubt people will take it seriously, but this practice of adding scores after the fact is ridiculous.
"Hoping Metacritic adds a review voting system where we could be asked to remove one very unhelpful review."
Right, then fanboys can pile on and affect the critical metascore of any exclusive not on their Console of Choice like they already do in the Userscores.
That sounds like a great idea.
@Imalwaysright
No, what you're doing is disagreeing. People are entitled to disagree with someone's opinion and attempt to argue the opposite all they want.
@Bimkoblerutso
No, people aren't, by and large, asking for censorship. They're asking that an unscored review that was assigned a score be taken from the scored reviews and placed back in the unscored reviews where it belonged in the first place.
That's not censor...
Coming soon: a thinkpiece from BuzzFeed and Kotaku on why this art they chose to highlight is sexist and representative of all gamers.
One does not simply sideline Norman Osborn for symbiotes.
Odds are they're sticking to events within the canon storyline.
Shooting people who are trying to kill you isn't murder, dude.