ShadowWolf712

Clicks don't get him revenue as he runs no ads on his site. Traffic, or lack thereof, is meaningless to him. He's funded exclusively via donations.

Bias?

The guy wanted to love the game and absolutely adores the new model of development they're trying to pioneer, why would he be trying to kill this game? He WANTED to love it and WANTS to see it succeed. It's why he took down his old video and even specifically talked to Metacritic to get his score first taken out of the metascore and then changed.

"For it to be a, you know, a one-off campaign that's consumed, would be a shame."

You...you know you can create "modes", right? That it doesn't have to be one or the other, right?

They lost me when they started adding supernatural powers.

Not gonna lie, I'd much rather have a Dragoon Remake/Remaster over any kind of sequel or prequel first. Or at least some sort of release with an updated translation. I love that game to death, my favorite of all time, but boy did it read like a fansub at times. lol

...how is it clickbait when clicks get him zero revenue?

Didn't they kinda outright say this entry was more about competitive/online modes back in ED though?

It's one of the reasons I wasn't much interested.

So saying a game is still pretty good but not as great as folks make it out to be is "hatred" now?

My guy, I dislike a LOT about BOTW, both as an open-world title and a Zelda title, and even I don't hate it. If someone saying something like that is "hate" to you, you really need to go outside more.

Which has what to do with this game?

Yes, how dare he not like what you like.

Why do so many of y'all have to bring in other games to try to defend this one?

I'm sorry your feelings are hurt.

Because someone being a drama queen about disagrees is rather childish and defensive. And to try to play the victim on top of it amplifies that.

I don't much care about his opinion one way or the other. I do care, however, that all these people make it pretty clear where they stand, that they will ride and die to a fault for a specific brand of plastic, and then get salty and start whining when they get a reputation for that.

"Nope. My comment is about why the 3DS sold less than it did. No where in my comment I said or implying the 3DS should've sold better.
I've only gave reason to why it sold less shipment."

That's literally making excuses as to why it didn't sell better.

I've seen plenty of people who get this same treatment on all sides, dude.

Sorry if that hurts your fee fees but it is what it is. Some folks have a reputation and get downvoted automatically around here. That people get so defensive about arbitrary up or downvotes over a submission of opinion is their choice.

That's the thing. You regularly not here for discussion. Every time someone tries to have a discussion you either get stompyfoot about it or just keep insisting you're right on a non-quantifiable assumption.

In this case, however, you're being downvoted for your rather strong implication that the 3DS version could have/would have sold FAR better but people are waiting for a phantom Switch version with no release date or even update on development. This is not th...

Or because you're a known fanboy who trolls quite often.

Or maybe, and here's the tricky part, Maybe the other two are much further along in production because we actually got both versions announced and DEMO'd long before the Switch even had dev kits available so they have a pretty good sized head start?

If you seriously think Sony's gonna fork over enough cash to get a publisher as big as Square to lose out, even temporarily, on sales from another system for a game as massive as Dragon Quest, you're nuts, dude. ...

It's also useless for any game requiring the touchpad to be swiped.

Ah, so THAT'S the new conspiracy theory.