>Nippon Era
Stop being a damn weeaboo, there were problems then too.
Gotta love how Nintendo tries to control their users in almost every way.
Just downloaded it. Can't wait to try it.
They're not even remotely "necessary", it's been proven time and again.
Forza/Horizon are bi-annual series that always consistently sell millions. Their budgets are not in doubt. They are not needed by any means. Horizon? Even had an in-game economy, but no Micros. Didn't need them. Sold millions. Getting story DLC and that's it.
This is a $60 Premium Game. They have no business shoving in additional paywalls stolen from a F2P m...
Affect*
And sadly, because some people either don't care, or even like it. They like that they have the option to cheese the game for a little extra cash.
Doubtful. It's not a literal wolf, but a wolf made from the environment around it. That implies a symbolic presence rather than physical.
And couple that with Ellie's declaration from the reveal trailer that she intends to find and "kill them all". Doubt she's referring to wolves.
wb's just gonna donate money.
Besides, they'd see a helluva lot more of it via a GoFundMe or similar campaigns.
Yes, I do. And I'm not even gay.
...no.
The same as android emulators do it?
That's a work hammer. If anything, it would signify building something. Facing the wolf also suggests enmity, that the Wolf is a shadow of a threat, as it is indeed a predatory creature and a known fear/concern to settlers back in the old days. Perhaps Joel or Ellie are trying to rebuild, have a life, and this "pack of predators" comes along to threaten it? Maybe the Fireflies found her and are hunting her?
It's not about laziness, it's about cost management. You're literally demanding each developer have at least three teams solely for the purpose of optimizing for platforms, or in the case of the Switch, essentially develop an entirely different game so as to be "scaleable" to the hardware.
That's not remotely reasonable.
Nor do I think Micros are jokes, they just have absolutely frigging NOTHING to do with the first half of your ...
You're interpreting this as "all Switch users are bitter" when it's talking about "Switch users who are bitter about this".
No, they don't.
Especially as it means a system with as much disparity as the Switch would eternally hold everything back. What you're suggesting inevitably keeps every future game that's not an exclusive a hostage to outdated hardware.
And the rest you tacked on to get agrees for this utterly ridiculous opening argument. lol
I dunno, dude, why are they promoting Call of Duty so hard when it's coming to the Xbox and PC? They must've paid Activision to keep it off the Switch, eh?
Marketing deals. Look them up.
They're casualizing the game by... not being archaic and putting it on other platforms?
@quantoxtech
It... didn't, actually. The numbers were neck and neck at launch, and the 3DS version underperformed while the PS4 version sold above expectations.
Shocking as it may be, a lot of the world doesn't consider Portability to be the end-all, be-all of gaming.
...literally nothing in that leak was true and Sony's not gonna waste money to pay for it to be on all systems but one. Come off it.
OK so... because they don't include DRM since they believe what's yours is yours because you paid for it, you think that's done to encourage piracy since it helps sales, or... what?
That's a myth. Especially for an annual/bi-annual franchise. They make money consistently off it.
I don't see PS shoving Micros into every game they make, and they seem more than able to keep funding things. Hell, Horizon easily could have had them but they still made the right call.