Part 1 of the interview can be found here.
http://n4g.com/news/773352/...
Viewing the ABC news site I didn't see the picture.
You are correct Dave.
Who disagrees? This is true. I watched the video there
While I would like R* to show up it's not going to happen. From what I remember they were going to do their own thing last year after E3 and that too never occurred.
I wish they would switch it up for a change. Show us Max Payne give us some good info on Agent and slap a GTA V logo on at the end.
gamersmint.com
Doing what it takes to get hits.
Overall good review. I think you were pretty generous with giving the "fun factor" an 8.5 considering how limited you are with things to do in this game I would have ranked it lower.
Other than that I think this is one of the more honest and accurate reviews I have read about this game. Keep up the good work.
Well originally when I went into this article that was my exact line of thought. Evidently it is more time consuming then we think.
Trying to see it from his perspective it is more cost effective to have every employee doing other things. That makes sense to me. I assume adding trophies to older titles would fall a bit on most developers "to do" lists.
Well that seems like a fair answer to me.
I have to agree with you. Saying "I play COD for the story" is akin to saying "I read playboy for the articles".
The story (for better or worse) has become an after thought for the co-op and multiplayer experience.
I would encourage you to see a doctor. You will enjoy these games more when you are conscious.
.changed my mind.
When i get home from work this will be on the front page. I'm calling it.
Why would someone approve this?
"Lots of cool things"
Really? Its E3. Did someone expect the opposite?
Exactly. There is zero content to this article.
Well i wouldn't say that you need to write a review for each one individually. That seems to be going from one extreme to the other.
I think on a site like this having a little more content to the article would go a long way. You want to give the reader a reason for reading. Here you had an opportunity to both sell people on the games and likewise sell people on the quality of your piece. It reads like it isn't finished.
Next time spend a little time ...
This article would be better if the author would go into detail as to why he would disagree with a review score. Perhaps articulate what flaws people have previously found with Manhunt 2 and then highlight some great gameplay elements that he feels made up for it.
If i had the ability to approve I wouldn't. I would encourage the author to go back and take a little more time being descriptive. Merely saying:
"Something about putting a plastic bag over...
Good for him. I hope he enjoys this game!
I'd like to know this aswell! This article is crap and had the reports to show it. Someone needs to revamp this system and suspend the ability to approve articles on the 10 dopes that ok'd this.
While I disagree with some parts of the article I believe it is well written. I haven't touched enslaved yet (I will) and enjoyed Heavenly Sword.
To be honest they lost me when revealing that main character as a pseudo twilight star. Taking a risk as a studio is one thing. But I can't see any justification in recreating a character to this degree. I'd rather they took liberties with the story line or perhaps take a risk by significantly modifying game play into so...