Yeah that irritated me a lot too. I've gotten used to it, but it still irks me sometimes.
@ chris1990
Somebody can't appreciate a joke.
Yeah, all the stuff coming from the Facebook page and Twitter profile is utter BS. The trailer itself and their website is all that I trust right now?
You're a piece of crap.
It's definitely not. Should be a pretty simple feature to have. You don't have to shoot it down just because the PS3 doesn't have it and the 360 does.
People are saying you can use Skype or cell phones. Are you guys retarded or something? So you're telling me that you will actually turn down a cross chat feature in favor of your cell phone or Skype? If so, you have some problems.
It's certainly a possibility. Ground Zeroes isn't even out yet, I feel like it'd be a little too much to start teasing for MGS5 right now.
If it were up to me, I'd just have it be Metal Gear Solid: The Phantom Pain exclusively for PS Vita. And then have MGS 5 later on down the line.
I'm sorry but they do not look the same at all. In most cases there is little to no difference, but the 360 is definitely better here. That's because the game was made for the 360 specifically, though.
@ CrowTRobot
Don't pretend the reason Sony kept supporting the PS2 and will keep supporting the PS3 isn't driven by profit. The PS2 had a massive install base and the PS3 had a slow start. The reason they supported it was because they wanted money, not out of the goodness of their heart.
@FriedGoat
....
@ Ares
Yeah, so was Halo...
Don't forget Resistance 4. And maybe a Metal Gear game and inFAMOUS 3.
I disagree with ME3 and PS Vita.
I think that it would be awesome. It definitely wouldn't be exclusive though. I'd like to see MGS Ground Zeroes on the Vita though.
Yeah my laptop is absolute shit in terms of gaming computers but I can play a buttload of games on it still, recent and old.
My family calls them farticles.
Except it matters to nobody who has a PS3 and can already play their non gimped versions on it. The Vita should be pushing exclusive titles, not PS3 games. And the free Vita title model will be unsustainable at a certain point.
I honestly think they should tone down the cross-features. It makes it seem like a companion piece that isn't worth owning if you already have a PS3.
Crystal Skull wasn't even bad. People complain about aliens at the end. So what? It's hard to accept aliens but not an ark that melts peoples faces off or a cup that grants immortality? Almost everything about Temple of Doom was unbelievable bullshit but nobody has a problem with it. Temple of Doom was definitely worse than Crystal Skull.
That's not what I'm saying. Even in terms of point and click adventure games, the Walking Dead is an average point and click adventure.
And just because the choices don't have a specific moral attached to them, doesn't make them any more meaningful or significant. Eg: Choosing between Carley or Doug in episode one is the same exact thing as choosing between Kaiden and Ashley in Mass Effect 1. What makes the Walking Dead choice so much better? Just like in any...
I think Reach had a great story. The multiplayer was great, but the maps were lacking. That said, I liked more maps in Reach than I do so far in 4. Ragnarok and Exile are my favorites and like Complex and Haven, but I just tolerate the rest.