Give me all the costumes from each FF and charge $10 per game and you have a deal. $10 for some random samurai outfits is a joke.
On Live is still out there? Huh... who would have known.
As the developer you should never be concerned if it is too much. You leave that up to the players who enjoy playing your games. All we care about is that the content you do have is high quality.
Having opinions is fine and dandy but attempting to claim that the majority of these games are even close to a worst 10 list is laughable, not just because of my opinion, but because as an experienced gamer I can give a fair comparison to nearly a hundred other MMO's.
Knowing when a game is bad or you simply don't enjoy it requires a level of experience that I feel the author lacks. I can respect when someone likes a game that I know to be mechanically solid, well wr...
I've not really had any issues with UPlay and I kind of enjoy the little extras you can unlock in their games using the UPlay points you earn.
Nothing like a choose your own adventure without the choosing... or adventure.
Not monitoring what your children are playing is irresponsible. Not understanding that the overwhelming majority of North American game players are over the age of 18 is irresponsible. Not understanding that the average age of current gamers is over the age of 30 is irresponsible.
Writing a faux-controversial article for the sake of getting hits on your website is IRRESPONSIBLE.
Actual sports. Legitimate "sports" or a way to push products?
What an idiotic article.
For the love of all give us this update on something other than a tablet/phone!
Is Pachter serious? Does he not understand that a service that is capable of offering streaming "rentals," even of older titles, is going to be a huge accomplishment?
I can think of dozens of games that I want to play and didn't feel like paying or could not afford to pay for. This service is going to let me catch up on everything, at my leisure, for a flat fee.
I was looking for someone to have posted this. The only reason this game was boosted to such extremes was due to the publicity the auction had been receiving on news sites.
He will never be payed.
This wasn't a hidden camera prank. They know the camera is there.
As a Tolkien fan I am offended. As a gamer, I wish they had chosen another world, perhaps the Forgotten Realms.
No worries. Other than spider-lady boobs, there wasn't anything to give the original an M rating.
Gone home was an interactive novel, not a game. It had more in common with an interactive DVD menu than an adventure title. I don't consider a choose your own adventure book to be a video game and this "game" doesn't even let you choose your own adventure!
This is a book on tape.
Not. A. Game.
These are all multi-player games where multi-player is a component of the single-player experience.
This article is stupid and is trolling for hits.
I should certainly hope not. If the Oculus Rift is going to have any chance of survival it is going to need to have games of equal price to current day or below.
So lets see. It's animated fan service. That's so bad it can't be on youtube? Give me a break.
Looks like it's going to be a shitty game.
Currently playing the game on PC. My rating for it: 7
1. The "campaign" is not even a good tutorial of modes only showcasing two game types across the entire "story". You can rarely hear or pay attention to the "story" as it is presented while playing the match. It is tacked on to check off additional game modes on the game content list and serves as a small, forced barrier to unlock aspects of the game.
2. Zero match customizati...