rlow1

Contributor
CRank: 11Score: 136320

So when Remedy made a descent game called Quantum Break, which didn't completely live up to the hype but by no means was a terrible, broken game. A lot of people on this website trashed it, simply because it was on xbox1. Now that a Sony game which isn't bad and fun to play has issues. People want to give them a pass instead of admitting they missed the mark as Remedy did. Doesn't mean its a bad game, just didn't live up to expectations? If you enjoyed it like I enjoyed Quantu...

2492d ago 2 agree7 disagreeView comment

I figured some immature types would down vote positive news.....I'll just type one word in response...Karma.

2495d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

Nice, way to go. Glad the VA was smart enough to accept this. Usually they aren't to quick on these type of things. If you were wounded or disabled this must really be a god send to be able to fully game once again.

2495d ago 5 agree3 disagreeView comment

My take is that even in 5 yrs your not going to have anything that can rival local hardware. Games have grown more sophisticated and polished and that bar will always rise. Long distance servers will always be at a disadvantage.

2495d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment
2496d ago Show

@KaaF you might be right but owning the trademark and the IP are two different things. In a 2016 article by Dualshockers they go on to show that's it's possible to own the trademark but not the IP itself and seeing that Kojimas supposed to be a independent developer...could a very possible senario....that doesn't mean your wrong, it just means both senario's exsit.

2498d ago 0 agree4 disagreeView comment

It's great they've listen to fan feedback and worked hard to add quality content. This is a title that definitely deserves to be revisited. Way to go Rare.

2499d ago 3 agree3 disagreeView comment

I agree with you on what you said. The platform provider does have the right to ban someone. But what is the deciding factor is the gray area. That's what needs to be defined. Because if they say offensive language is to be banned. Then shouldn't people be banned for swearing? Without strong defined rules it leaves it to the other person sitting in a server room deciding your fate. Also, to deny someone their actual games, I could see banning from online play, but to take away a whole...

2505d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

No matter how you slice it, this is just plain bad practice. I can understand some exclusive content but to go this far is destiny all over again. Some content never ended up coming over to Xbox and Bungie charged full price..... Hopefully this will just be a timed thing but if not then that's on Sony. This is a practice that goes way back to the Nintendo and Sega console and is just plain tiresome......Stop giving these companies a pass, because no matter what side of the stupid fanboy ...

2512d ago 7 agree9 disagreeView comment

I agree with a lot of your statement but again it depends on what you mean by content. In terms of first party games and developing games they've failed this generation. It pales in comparison to the 360 days, especially the first three years of that consoles life. That said they currently have 1,942 according to Wikipedia. In that context they are correct and Google doesn't have anywhere near that.

2515d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

Okay he said the word "content"......Didn say Third, Second or First party....just content and he's right. Google is just starting out and they'll have to develop the relationships and build games. MS has plenty of content, just not a lot of first party content....something they are in the process of rectifying with all the studio's they've bought.

2515d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

Interesting on how this will play out. Amazing on how the landscape has changed in the last 5yrs.......the next 5 is going g to get interesting......that's for sure

2515d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

Well I'm hoping this turns out to be good. But even if it turns out to be good......was it good enough for EA to cancel the other projects?

2516d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

I'm excited because it's a new IP and it doesn't seem to be about just shooting the bad guy or each other......Ready for something new and unique......my finger and toes are crossed.

2516d ago 4 agree1 disagreeView comment

It's not that having a different option out their is bad......but when your paying for exclusives......this starts a new paradigm. If steam starts paying for new content....then it's going to get really nasty......for us gamers.

2517d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

I think competition is good and warranted. That said, if I was launching a physical store would I launch it without the basics ??? These devs are becoming the worst.....let's launch and fix it all in the post.....that's the mentality today. Launching half a store....in the physical world you get crushed.....then spending money to lock games in but not have a proper store...... Competition is good as long as you bring something competent to compete with.

2518d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

It would be cool if they do, but i'd rather wait for a polished and complete game. To many games rushing out the door with to many issues....Hopefully these will avoid this.

2519d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

I agree it's has the hype going with it. It's the title I'm most excited for because it's something new and it's single player. Plus it looks like you'll be crafting your own story.....Looking forward to it.

2523d ago 4 agree1 disagreeView comment

This was seriously the best one of the day.

2524d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

lol, that was hilarious.

2524d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment