I wouldn't have thought they'd pack LittleBigPlanet with it. Just doesn't seem father's day-y.
Well, R* rarely hits a bad note (GTA IV is debateable since it's an acquired taste cause it's so slow paced but I loved it) so you should have some faith in them. I mean RDR was delayed multiple times but we ended up getting one of the best open world games ever.
Plus I just saw the movie City of God and it takes place where MP3 takes place. Could be good.
Just don't doubt them. I've never played a bad R* game (haven't played them a...
"However, co-op leads to one of my main complaints with Peace Walker – and I only have two. This co-op focus means that some of the game is a pain in the ass (if not entirely undoable) by yourself. I've seen a ton of other game critics – folks I know can play – struggle and scream over some of the boss battles in this game. For me, I thought they were crazy until I came to the second battle with the final boss – Peace Walker itself. On my third attempt, I played for 45 minutes before...
Yeah I understand your point and of course the PS2 didn't sell big cause of Jak and Daxter or Kingdom Hearts or MGS2 or MGS3. It sold because of the DVD player, Gran Turismo and casual games. But still, every developer on the Wii that pushes the console to its limits in creativity and power felt disappointed when they don't sell like they should've (I hear nothing but good from Red Steel 2 and that didn't sell well either).
It's nothing against the con...
Yeah there's really no reason to tack on an extra piece when MGS4 wraps everything up and ends on a good note. Exploring Naked Snake's untold story is fine. It's untold. But Solid Snake is done. He's had a hard life. Deserves some rest.
Ah, that's just what I did not want to hear. I'm sure it's a great game (see bio for how much I a. love MGS and b. love the story of Naked Snake) but that was my fear when I heard it was a co op focused game. I'm still gonna get it eventually (I'm flat broke right now) but I hate that I won't get the full package of a game from a strictly singleplayer focused series because I'm gonna play it alone.
Yeah, even if I was excited for Natal (I'm not), my 360 is in front of a bed. I'd have to rearrange my room completely to have any (like, any at all) room for natal.
So unless something so earth-shatteringly amazing is shown at E3 (something earth-shatteringly amazing enough to redecorate my entire set up), I don't care.
Well they didn't exactly sell like they should've with the install base being so ridiculously big.
It just comes down to most people who play core games (at least a good percentage) like having achievements/trophies and good multiplayer with good graphics. Without that, most just skip over those wii games.
And most people do just skip over those hardcore wii games.
http://www.escapistmagazine...
That's actually like an 8 from him. If you can play guess the number anyways.
You have to remember though, they are reviewing the same game. Opinions only differ so much when a game is/isn't that fun.
This is just taking it too far already. Am I uneasy about the changes? Kinda but when I'm in hour 10 of inFamous 2 and I'm enjoying it because SP knows how to make a great game, I won't really care. I highly doubt it's gonna be as bad as they're making it seem.
People just like complaining.
edit: And they're doing this to inject more story in inFamous 2. God, I couldn't think of anything better they could've done. I love...
Finally someone said it! He looks like Shepard.
And maybe this'll all be for the better? Hopefully.
I kinda wanna replay inFamous after all this talk of it now though.
Oh wow. A perfect bullseye! That's exactly right. He just felt bad for being in Cole's shadow. So he acted impulsively and weak, like a human. Very understandable.
Well said. Bubbles+
I guess I was the only guy that actually liked Zeke huh? I thought he was really funny and he was flawed. I'm glad he didn't truly turn into your enemy.
And this new Zeke looks good.
I'm just used to old Cole. New isn't exactly bad, just different.
It's not a game killer though. Still day one.
Right, step 1. Buy from amazon.
That easy. I also bought amazon prime which was $80. So I got RDR day 1 at 2 pm. A lot at first but I've already saved $100+ in 2 months on movies, games and books.
Use amazon everyone.
Hmmmmmmmmm, yeah, you're right. Love sucker punch but if I could only have two games for my PS2, they would've been MGS3 and KH1 in that order.
Can't wait for KH BBS.
I'm not saying I'm agreeing or anything but "tears of gore" or something would've worked better since it actually rhymes with said implied game title.
Just an observation.
Honestly, outside of a few announcements, it probably will be a lot of Move stuff. Which isn't really my thing outside of LittleBigPlanet (the only reason I'll be buying the Move) but Sony's E3's are usually pretty solid all around. So I doubt they'll disappoint.
On topic, I love sucker punch so inFamous 2 is a day 1 game for me.
No offense but I'll never understand people who call Gears of War GoW or GeOW. GoW is God of War and Gears of War is just Gears. Easier isn't it? Gears 3?
Again, no offense. Just an observation.
And Bioshock 2 doesn't seem worth my money. Bioshock 1 had a great story (well, the famous commentary on all games at least). Bioshock 2 just doesn't seem necessary.
Well it wouldn't only be an announcement saying they're going on the PS3. They'd have to say like L4D or Portal on the PS3. I highly doubt that though but they wouldn't just go on stage saying they're on the PS3 now.
And yeah, I think they said they tried streamlining the development process for L4D2 to see how it would work.
If I had to bet though, a new source engine that's ridiculously realistic showing HL3 or L4D3 to be released ...