Did you play Halo Wars? I played it for about 30 minutes and had to put it away, that game doesn't even come close to a real RTS.
Yeah guys, as console gamers you want the neutral platform to die. The one that doesn't have you being charged for stuff on the disk, the one that doesn't charge you for 3-4 intern made maps that use assets from the singleplayer campaign. The one that allows people to create their own content and breath new life into older titles extending your use from them.
I've always played console games, I've always played PC games for 15+ years now. I've watched how console gaming has chang...
I haven't played a PC game at a resolution in that area since 1999. It's funny how much of a big deal was made of the consoles doing 720P, when the PC's been doing it since the PS1 and N64 were around.
The idea that the first Crysis was doing a lot more at one time then Killzone 2 ever did, escapes you doesn't it?
Modern Warfare 2 doesn't run at 1080P on the PS3 or 360, it's just not possible for games to run native at 1080P. Look at the huge space that gets rendered in Crysis compared to 99% of console games and it just smashes them.
In the first jungle level of Uncharted 2, watch the top of the tree's when the level start's. Very very very poor job with the foliage and UC2 doesn't even render half of what's going on in Crysis.
Modern Warfare 2 running at 60 fps at below 720P says hi!
Running in 720P...check.
No AA, and the post processing effect employed in some PS3 titles just makes it look blurry, no thanks.
Smaller environments/closed environment's.
Move from a dynamic jungle to a static city scape (what we've seen so far)
Crysis should have stuck on the PC, look at the foliage in Uncharted 2. By far one of the best looking PS3 titles with just AWFUL foliage.
A Franchise launched on the PC, turned into something COMPLETELY different. GRAW didn't even look like the first Ghost Recon, what is everyone's aversion to games that make you think and risk reward situations literally have risk's? Is it to much for you?
What is it 2002? Yes...we have been gaming at beyond HD for longer then you. 1920*1200/1080 is easy for most PC's with a half way decent specs.
It's setting the bar for consoles, video games as a whole? If we wanna go backwards sure.
You went and bought a Core 2 Extreme (C2QX or C2DX?) then paired it with a 8800 GT? Are you mental?
You're a funny guy.
Pachter was also really on the money saying the PS3 is more powerful then any PC on the market. Clearly he's a genius.
Bubbles for your brain.
You can run any game through Steam.
All of those fancy mods and skins you download for UT3 on the PS3 were made on a PC not a PS3. I find it absolutely HILARIOUS that you guys talk crap about the PC but the moment you guys MAY get a cut down feature we have, it's the best idea EVER. Or how about when M/KB is a feature on PS3 game? Why you people don't just play on the platform this is all native to is absolutely beyond me.
True HD at real native resolutions, Actual control over your character (No sticky aim here),...
NPD numbers do not matter when you're looking at PC software sold. Why even bother posting them?
*edit* In the past 2 years I have bought 28 of my last 30 PC games on Steam or D2D.
@5.3
A lot of PS3 and 360 games don't even run in 720P, set a PC game to 1280*720(Or the closest) and tell me what your framerate is. If your PC EVER had any business playing games well in the past 5 years the framerate will be higher.
Mastiffchild that's the biggest load excuses I've ever heard. Level playing field? Where in any competition is there a perfectly level playing field? I guess everyone in Formula 1 should give up because Mclaren and Ferrari have massive amounts of money to throw at R&D.
A) Look at your hardware, whats the most outdated about it and plot a rational, doable plan to upgrade it to the point you're happy with. I guarantee you turn your resolution down to 1280*720 you'll be pushing ...
The PS3 looks fine too... as does the PC. Yay we all get good years, can we just play nice?