Sony's product: Controller + ability to sense movement(via eyetoy)
Natal: ability to sense movement + body recognition + voice recognition
So who wins?
in my opinion, natal is cool, but wayyy too casual. I mean, i'd like to see a sports game use it, im not so sure that it will sense the angle of your wrist for games like tennis, baseball. but i wish sony's product had cool menu navigation like natal
ya... in my opinion, if Sony doesn't get their product out first, they lost. Natal is compatible with existing games right now, while Sony's controller is to be used for future games... atleast Sony has a release date
---Natal---
The thing that Natal's missing is something to hold. Sony couldn't have said it better themselves. "We learned from eyetoy buttons are needed for some experiences." We also have to remember that Sony's motion controller works in conjunction with Eye Toy, which can also track your movement... Natal on the other hand just tracks movement.
---Sony's Motion Controller---
The thing that Sony's motion controller is missing is compatibility. Natal suppo...
---Natal---
The thing that Natal's missing is something to hold. Sony couldn't have said it better themselves. "We learned from eyetoy buttons are needed for some experiences."
---Sony's Motion Controller---
The thing that Sony's motion is compatibility. Natal supposedly works right now with xbox 360. Sony says they will do stuff with this in the future, and that might mean a long time...
Pros of Natal: Easy menu navigation
Cons of Natal: ...
you can't compare mgs4 to this, because mgs is a stealth action game, and this is most likely a ninja game
What would be surprising is if we saw SNAKE come on 360, but raiden, fine, we'll just have to see how a game with raiden turns out. The great part of the Metal Gear Solid series is the stealth action, this is probably ninja type game.
TO PS3 fanboys: what are you so mad about?
TO 360 fanboys: what are you so happy about?
I expect this game to be like ninja gaiden in mgs world... i'm not so sure on buying this game...
yes, good point. ps3 released 6 years after ps2, and ps2 released 5 year?? after ps1
I assume that they will release a ps4 after ps2's 10 year life span is up, or until ps3 becomes less than $200 which i predict will be the price of ps3 in 2011/12.
in my opinion, working on the next generation as soon as it is available is pretty stupid. I would think the developer kits are very early versions, and won't include some stuff that might be added later??
I could go on about how bad this article is, but that makes my post long. Let's keep it short and simple.
2006-2007, i'd say 360 has advantage in software
2008 i'd say pretty much even... both ps3 and 360 had good games
2009 i'd say ps3 pretty much gets it here for software
who wins? people with both consoles.
The demo was really fun. After you complete the first mission, i thought it was over, it left me wanting more, but they actually provided more of the game. In my opinion, if they stopped the demo after the first mission, it would have been a perfect place, because thats the part that left me craving for more.
why aren't any of these bundles released in the us
is there a way to unapprove this, links broke... title's kind of misleading also. I thought it meant how sexy the ps3 looks, not what it can churn out.
Core i7 is built for pc's. It is meant to handle a lot of things at once, while the cell is meant to do things one at a time. Gaming processors can't be compared to pc processors.
Don't get me wrong when I say this, but this article is talking about video encoding, which the ps3 excels at because it has 7 spe's that are perfect for this job. Put the cell in a computer, and you have no more power than a Pentium 4 processer. The Cell excels at single calculations.
Ov...
Why this article is not a good one:
-It basically states "In my opinion Nintendo is best fitted to win this console generation for the simple fact that they already lost 2 wars prior."
-Also states: "Why Sony shouldn’t win this Generation – Sony already won two previous generations"
TIP: choose your words carefully
Let me get terms straight. "Losing" the "console war" does not necessarily mean having the lowe...
cross game chat is not a killer feature that sells consoles, so why would Sony care about it?
wait... ps2 games are still being released?
wait... they're serious?
No way that will happen. OnLive sounds really expensive to maintain. I don't think they could profit from it.
Wow!
PS3 version has the better outside. I mean, the first screenshot is hands down ps3, but...
360 version has better indoors. The 360 version was better in the second screenshot hands down.
yea... i think blockbuster would be a better choice for ps3 because blockbuster is not US only
absolutely wrong title. They don't lose 25mil, they make $25mil less than the $1 billion they they make.
Forza looks really good, but GT5 is near perfection