I believe the biggest mistake in this game was choosing an open world style. People are constantly looking for "reality", how the police behave, how pedestrians behave, how the environment reacts to physics, how is drving, whether the city seems "alive" or is it a dead and boring environment to explore, how interactive is the "world" around you so on and so forth, which in turn creates many more possibilities for "bugs". Putting it all together is a hug...
I played on Xbox One X and I don't want to resell my copy, even if I could get all my money back. The overall disappointment that I felt while playing the game, unresponsive, blurry and laggy experience, without even seeing the bugs. I tried to take the physical copy back to the store, but they refused that the box was already open and now I have to live with the feeling that I supported this company. I don't care about the patches 2 days or a week later, let alone 2021 when the next ...
I also had to sell my copy after 1 hour of play .. a blurry, laggy mess.
This game will not take you to the future, but to 2012 instead.
It's unfixable, the game engine is just outdated.
This game also feels very dated on Xbox One X. I basically had to stop playing. I also read that it's not even worth playing on the Series X at this stage, and especially not on the PS5 (even lower resolution). The game is too ambitious. It should have been out for a year or two with less content and focusing more on polish.
It looks and runs poorly even on the One X. I stopped playing an hour later. I felt the headache begin to come, the low resolution (1440p--ish) and not so stable 30fps. Waiting for my Series X to arrive and hopefully things get better.
to CaptainHenry916: Series X sell out everywhere, even with 0 games. No need to delay the system. Halo Infinite gameplay shown was after they had finished the story / campaign, without being polished or visually enhanced, which is usually done later.
Not all are hardcore gamers (200 fps minimum, 1 millisecond minimum etc). Consoles are enough to sit on the couch and enjoy some gaming. It's not about the money at all.
The exclusivity could be changed:
It first releases on one platform and a year later elsewhere. Then the quality would be preserved (focusing one platform at a time) and others would be able to play on other platforms later. Releasing a year earlier would also solve the problem of keeping you on the "X" platform (Nintendo, PlayStation or Xbox) in this way, you can play games "first" on my platform. In the end, absolutely everyone would benefit. Developers will sel...
There are thousands and thousands of rules set in the world. It should not be difficult to establish "one more rule", no electronic device should be sold over the MSRP. We need to get the whole electronics industry under control. All forums and sales environments are checked by moderators and there would be an end to this once and for all! You buy 500, you sell 500 and if games are included, ask for a little more. People are victims of their own stupidity.
Basically, S holds back X. Not even the old gen machines, but the lower spec version of the upcoming gen machine lol, ouch. Multiplat games will look better on PS5. Valhalla has already proven this in comparison. The Xbox shot himself in the foot.
They never care, there is no enthusiasm in their games. The last game I played from Ubi was Far Cry 5 and I forced myself to play it for about 5 hours. Every new installment of the game looks like a copy of the last game.
He probably wanted to say that 3-6 months after the launch, they would not be able to produce more consoles than sell them. Regardless of the games, they sell out all the consoles that they produce. At the moment here are no games as you say but still, people desperately trying to get the system.
