Honestly i don't understand a word of the first thing you said, as your grammar is very bad, secondly here are crysis in snow: http://i4.photobucket.com/a...
Hmm, there are a lot of diehard PS3 and 360 fans as well on N4G.
The gameplay of the first Crysis was good, i loved the semi openworld. However story and online was not really good.
True, however there are ice levels too in Crysis, anyways i wait and see that GG have in store for the final version of KZ3, anyways it will still be an awesome game, and overall much likely a better game than Crysis.
You can compare snow and jungle levels, in terms of texture resolutions, and sorry that trailer showed too many low resolution textures.
The PS3 rams are not that much faster as far as i know, throw in a source please?
Crysis has as good physics as KZ, the lightning is really up to what you like.
Anyways, personally i think Killzone is a better game, but Crysis got better graphics.
Sorry to break your bubble, but this does not look better than Crysis on pc, i looked awesome, yes, but there were a lot of low res textures. And yes i know i'm going to get 50? disagrees, but that tells more about you than me, though you should see http://i183.photobucket.com... before hitting the disagree button.
You talking as Natal and Move is similar, they are not. Just because Natal would be cheaper, it doesn't make it a better buy than move.
If Mass Effect 2 is GOTY or not, has really nothing to do with the 360, as first the game is on PC, and second, they could easily have made the exact same game for the PS3...
OH btw, fail troll is fail troll: "I haven't even played Mass Effect 2 yet." (Comment made by the OP later)
I really hope you are being ironic....
They already said they are working on Battlefield 3, so it would not be Bad Company 3.
"The best games are on the ps3 anyways"
Maybe for you, not for me :P
Other companies should look carefully, as this is how you do a proper DLC.
We already know a lot about GT5 so there are no suprises there, however zelda would be a good guess.
"PS3 exclusives like UC2, KZ2, GOW3 and GT5 look better than any PC game bar crysis, lets get that out the way first."
Nope, Bad Company 2 looks better than at least KZ2 and UC2, GOW3 uses fixed cameras and are completely linear, and still BC2 looks better if you ask me.
GT5? Lets wait until it's out, but yes it does look very good.
Sorry, while there are PC fanboys who are as bad as PS3/360 guys, they are clearly outnumbered.
OMG, screenshot from Mass Effect 1 when he talks about Mass Effect 2, and that God Of War shot did not look like the GOW3 kratos model.
You just forgot the most important point: GFlops are not all that matters, sorry any technical expert would say an I7 980 runs way faster than the cell. Why do you think IBM stopped making Cell processers?
My Nvidia 9600gt GPU runs at about 300 gigaflops according to Wikipedia, my point: Gigaflops are irrelevant.
True, Crysis 1 did not sell that well on release, because it was way ahead of its time, and not that great optimized. Today better drivers and cheaper hardware has made Crysis playable for more people, and i'm quite sure it sold 3 million+.
I don't think you can really name one single game as the most anticipated.