qwertyz

Member
CRank: 5Score: 14760

even bulletstorm pc maxed out looks much better than uncharted 3 so what are you talking about. you are obviously very ignorant

metro 2033 and crysis 2 MINIMUM settings look better than uncharted 3 and anything on consoles for that matter in fact most multiplatform games that have made it to pc when maxed out 1080p 16xAf look better than anything on consoles(including UC3) although only few pc games actually push pc hardware but you don't really need high end parts to be...

5225d ago 12 agree6 disagreeView comment

lol the rsx is weak compared to xenos which is why it needs help from the spes did you know that ? NO

the ps3 was designed this way; the rsx does basic rendering(geometry and texturing) while the cell does......just about everything else :/ the rsx doesn't have much horsepower compared to xenos some game devs(crytek, epic,bizarre creations) and even IBM have mentioned this but the cell is there to pick up the slack.

the 360s cpu can do some graphics calcu...

5225d ago 5 agree9 disagreeView comment

according to dice they both look equally crappy(run at pc lowest settings)at 1280x704 with no v-sync, no texture filtering and smaller maps and player count

the ps3 uses spu based differed rendering while 360 uses tile based differed rendering

they are both the same thing but the ps3 version is simoly called spu based differed rendering because the differed rendering is done on SPU and NOT the gpu

the 360s gpu is much more advanced than the p...

5225d ago 13 agree18 disagreeView comment

the 360 version will still require a 1.5gb install to get the full experience(higher res textures)

5225d ago 4 agree1 disagreeView comment

sony has done similar specials before. by a sony vaio get a ps free, buy a sony bravia gat a free ps3 so what are you talking about

http://www.studentbuyinggui...

5226d ago 9 agree9 disagreeView comment

this is pc LOWEST settings confirmed by DICE(they said consoles will run BF3 at pc LOWEST settings so the 360 version will be just as crappy compared to the pc version) but looks amazing for a console game

5226d ago 4 agree28 disagreeView comment

lol both 360 and ps3 are not as powerful as dual gpu high end 2005 pcs

on topic consoles are not pcs and they'll never be they'll never be as open and useful as pcs infact pc are used to create console games

5226d ago 16 agree8 disagreeView comment

it could look much better than reach other dev have shown the 360 can far surpass reach visuals

crysis 2,crysis 1, gears of war 2, battlefied 3 and RAGE(which runs 60fps) LOOK way better than reach in every way

5226d ago 5 agree5 disagreeView comment

@tc389

the reason the install is optional for 360 is because NOT ALL 360s ship with hard drives but all ps3s ship with hard drives so making it compulsory won't shut out any ps3 owners.

textures are streamed to gpu through vram but disk streaming to memory is much slower than hdd streaming to memory and the higher the texture quality the longer it takes to stream from disk/HDD to ram(and then to gpu where it will be rendered) and the disk streaming speed ...

5227d ago 6 agree4 disagreeView comment

minor really ?lol crysis 2 pc even without directx 11 patch and high res texture pack as well as other pc games like hard reset, metro 2033, crysis warhead, crysis 1(even without mods), GTA IV, witcher 2, shogun 2 and a few others(you can add battlefield 3 and batman arkham city when they arrive on pc by next month) makes even the best looking console games look like ps2 games(that includes kz2/3, uncharted 2/3, gears 3, crysis 1 remake, crysis 2 and others)

even a 2005 dual ...

5227d ago 4 agree8 disagreeView comment

looks amazing for a console game but most multiplats that have made it to pc over the past few years look better than this including bulletstorm , assassins creed 2 and even red faction:guerrilla :/ there are even a number of pc games that make UC3 look last gen so this visuals don't wow me at all

by the way the desert scene is just repeated textures with per-calculated physics(no geometry AT ALL) technically not that impressive the ship level was superior from a technic...

5227d ago 3 agree14 disagreeView comment

the difference will be much bigger when you see the pc version maxed out and he console versions running in motion rather than compressed screens. the pc version can potentially be a full gen ahead of the console version

5227d ago 8 agree3 disagreeView comment

the 360 version sits at 95 with 38 reviews while the ps3 version its at 96 with only 16 reviews they are the same on both platforms with the 360 version looking slightly better they will score the same when all the reviews are in for the ps3 version

about metacritic you hit the nail on the head I really couldn't have said it better

5228d ago 1 agree0 disagreeView comment

lol most games on 360 today look much better than gears 1 and gears 3(which isn't even the best looking game on 360) completely destroys gears 1 on every level there's a massive visual leap between those 2 and even halo reach blows ears 1 out of the water along with almost every multiplatform game.you ps3 fanboys on this site are truly delusional if you think no game on 360 looks as better than gears 1

both consoles are maxed out and neither can eevn prouce graphocs t...

5228d ago 2 agree3 disagreeView comment

both console betas look the same and they both run at the same resolution 1280x704 at LOWEST pc settings with no texture filtering or v-sync for the final build so what are you talking about ?

both console final versions will look the same

5228d ago 13 agree5 disagreeView comment

the specs you listed are FAR too weak that won't be able to run Samaritan tech demo or even BF3 pc max settings visuals visuals and the ream is WAY too small next gen consoles need at least 8gb ram(ram is dirt cheap now so is very possible) . those aren't even 2011 high end pc specs and you think a console launching with these specs in 2013 will be enough ? LOL you don't know what you're talking about

5228d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment

@Shadowaste
you forgot to mention that consoles run BF3 at pc LOWEST settings with much smaller maps, less buildings, foliage and other geometry and yet runs at 704p with no texture filtering, no v-sync, lots of screen tearing and will drop below 30fps when under pressure.

even a core 2 duo,2gb of cheap ram and a $40 gpu will run BF3 better than consoles LOL

consoles are so weak that even bulletstorm on pc looks better than anything on consoles includ...

5229d ago 2 agree1 disagreeView comment

pc version>>>>>> ;>> 360(slightly) > ps3

the pc version will destroy the console version and anything on consoles in the visual department and also support PhysX which will add much more to the experience. PC FTW!!!!

5229d ago 1 agree10 disagreeView comment

naughty dog said uncharted 2 used 90% of ps3s power and not 100, they also said they optimzed the engine for UC3 to run a bit faster and save a bit of processing time. uncharted 3 doesn't look that much better than 2 believe it or not(the animations have improved though but the lighting, textures and other things haven't improved significantly) and the ps3 doesn't have infinite power no console does.

even as good as UC3 looks it doesn't look as good as crysis ...

5229d ago 3 agree12 disagreeView comment

sales don't equal quality.

call of duty is low quality in every way one of the worst fps ips this gen

5230d ago 2 agree2 disagreeView comment