Excuses? Where?
Just truth. Haven't you played Halo CE, 2, 3, Reach? Show me the gritty ultra realistic graphics there?
Do you visit Halo forums? Are you part of betas where fans asked for a classic Halo artstyle constantly? Is this video representing a classic Halo artstyle?
Answer is No I bet to the majority of those questions.
I'm not after a Halo game that looks like it was just a bunch of megascans stuff put together to look pretty.
Cool but it doesn't look anything like Halo.
Halo has never had gritty realistic graphics and only Halo 4/5 pushed in that direction. The majority of the fanbase didn't really like 343 pushing Halo in that direction and called for a classic artstyle return.
That kind of talk is all over the 343 forums and Insider Forums. Hense we are getting a Halo/Halo 3 themed reboot. This looks like neither so it isn't what that true fans were asking for.
...
@Fox
Go out and what do you see?
Is everything crammed into a 1/2 mile or mile around you? No it isn't. If it was it would look rather silly and overcrowded.
The landscape was far from barren. We barely saw much of it in the gameplay demo as it is.
Another example of a fake Halo fan that thinks mentioning no ADS is a bad thing. Community has mostly been against ADS. If you knew Halo or the community you would know that.
@Fox
I can say various things too like "pot meet kettle" and "damage control talking points" and drop them in randomly also....doesn't mean you know what you are talking about. In the case of landscapes that we are talking about you clearly just made that up.
You saying my words are damage control for one is stupid. Just giving my opinion that there are several locations just in that small demo we didn't even get to see. Which ...
Looks more like a newer more expanded version of Halo CE : Mission 2 to me. Funnily enough that's what they said they were going for.
@FOXHOUND922
"try again"
People get so butthurt from other people's opinions and thoughts. Grow up mate. CBA to "try again" because I know I saw several points of interest. Also second mission of Halo CE that it's loosely based on wasn't exactly full of needless stuff.
The area we saw was relatively small and I saw several places to check out including that huge crashed ship, the place the demo ends in and several...
Empty? Wow you made that assumption from that small demo? I saw various points of interest throughout just in the small demo which were not explored in that area
Shut up. My god, fanboys out in force the past few days here.
Graphics aren't everything in a game.
@Teflon02 either way they get your money
Don't use logic mate. PS fanboys hate logic. They just want to 'win' in sales so they can continue this massive circle jerk for stroking their ego.....strange because it's not like Sony earn them money 😂
All of the consoles have positives and negatives. Fanboys wont see that.
Lot of assumptions going on here. Little fact.
The head of Phil Spencer? This site is ridiculous. Moderators should be sorting the likes of people like you out.
You made a big assumption that the game hasn't been designed with Ray Tracing in mind. You didn't code it so your comment is pointless.
Chances are the have coded it with ray tracing in mind and at a later date it'll be ready.
Saying it looks like its from the 360 shows your true colours on the topic "Am I a Fanboy".
Talking pure BS. Even if it isnt the best looker on a demo produced in Jan/Feb 2020 its not 360 level.
What are the downvotes for? Downvoting truth = fanboyism. Grow the hell up people.
It looks good, didn't say it didn't. Though it's basically let's slap a Halo ring on the title screen and call it Halo. Theres more to it than that and it's also true that Halo never had ultra realistic graphics. Is that or is that not true?
So how is this damage control. In the end I dgaf I'm not on 343 payroll. Just like Halo. Though hey liking anything from MS/Xbox isn't 'cool' at N4g. So the disagrees are guaranteed on anything positi...