Sony will forever regret saying "EA access does not represent value for money", it will come back time and time again to bite them in the arse.
Ive been enjoying the full game of Dragon Age : Inquisition for free for the last 3 hours.
EA access represents amazing value for money.
Titanfall was a great game.
Mock it all you like.
Destiny.
Ewwwwww...
EA access is awesome.
If Ubisoft is the new EA, this would be incredible news for XB1 owners who would get a tonne of free games lol !
Its always been known that DDR3 is faster at streaming data than GDDR5.
Trying to tell the fanboys this though ends up with 1000 disagrees and a desert eagle pointed at your face haha
Cod aw is a great game.
Got to say it though, Titanfall is a much more complete and better multiplayer game.
Better controller.
Better online connectivity.
Better framerates.
Slightly lower resolution, which is slowly disappearing (gta v is the same on each console).
I'd say that overall, it does game multiplats better and have better exclusives and better features like ea access.
EA access is the best £19.99 i ever spent.
PSN value for money doesn't even touch this.
Guess we will never find out since stupid parity means games will be forced to work on networks held together by bits of string like Sony's.
I remember when the ps3 was announced and Sony stated it would run games at 120fps.
Lmfao.
Everyone in the industry lies.
Oh, and lets see how many disagrees i get from the fanboys because i mocked Sony, even though it is 100% truth what i said.
Can i ask why you would even say something like that.
I mean seriously, have a think about what you just typed lol
True.
I stated this happened in advanced warfare.
The xb1 keeps frames per second sacrificing resolution.
The ps4 sacrifices fps to keep resolution.
Since we know it happens this way in at least one game, it could also happen in unity.
Strange how IGN reviewed this on XB1 and made no mention or bad frame rates.
I have a strong suspicion it is fine on the XB1.
We all know that the XB1 dynamically drops resolution, like in advanced warfare to ensure frame rate doesnt suffer.
The ps4 keeps the resolution but drops frame rates.
I cant find any bad reports on the xb1 version, other than comments that appear to either assume it does or simply groups it with th...
Driveclub servers down for weeks = tiny article
Halo MCC servers down for 10 mins = N4G explodes
Quite a weak list really imo.
Couple of indies, some multiplats, a demo and a rehashed game as number one.
All these games are good / great, but this list really highlights the lack of those "must have" new titles the ps4 should have by now.
I'm proud to be a minority.
XB1 for life.
(actually i own a ps4 aswell, but i find it completely boring at the moment :))
Interlaced resolution will only look "sharper" against lower resolution when the picture isn't moving.
When it moves, it becomes a mess of alternate frames being displayed at the same time.
Why?
Cod:aw runs smoother by a considerable margin on the xb1
Your definition of high graphical quality is clearly different to mine.
None of those games push graphics very far.
Sure cod:aw has probably the best models out of any game so far, but the background physics have been reduced heavily to the point almost nothing reacts when you shoot it.
I will also remind you that single player cod aw is not 60fps on the ps4. It is variable 30 to 60 fps.
EA access gives you all new games for free. The complete full game a week before they get released.
The only downside is that it's just for 6 hours of gameplay.
6 full hours of gameplay is enough though to get to enjoy alot of stuff :)