Well that's an unfortunate comparison. It's likely to be far better than Fallout 3.
Boo hoo. It's nominated for graphics and that's all it deserves.
Call of Duty: Imagine Babies?
Try 500,000
Or just get it on PC: how it was meant to be played.
What the hell?
Both are overrated.
Don't even give this idiot the time of day. Do not click.
@Willio
Indeed. It simply wasn't positioned and given proper context.
Hell, I can think of something right now. There's a hidden nuke in the States that's going to go off and you need to get close to Makarov to find out where it is. Thus having to do the horrid things he engages in.
It's more problematic for the game than anything else.
Right, this Nordic dude is Persian. lol.
The problem isn't the content itself but how it was positioned within the game. The scene is only made possible through the largest of plot holes and because of that it seems like lazy controversy bait on the part of Infinity Ward.
The most ridiculous part isn't even the scene itself but the one that comes up directly after. You accidentally shoot a few civies in Rio and it's game over. I found that really quite funny. Interactivity is a new form, sure, but it's also incredibly d...
Nah. Bring on Freedom Fighters 2!
Grenade spamming and infinite respawns aren't enemy abilities, they're prime examples of lazy design.
The AI flanks more often and navigates the environment more realistically, which makes for a less difficult but more interesting firefight.
PC is where it's at.
Not enough 'splosions and fugly hoes hmm?
The writing is pretty terrible. Definitely reviewing a pirate copy.
One of the best monster movies ever. This one has a new director, though, so dial down that hope indeed.
And the game: lol.
Broken Embargo. Fools.
IO Interactive is a good dev. The concept and style has always had potential.
This time the tedium depends on you. If you spend three hours looking for a little emblem on a massive building, then it's bound to be boring. Only a street away there's probably something to do.