I must admit as an AC fan, I don't like the way Ubi's taking the Assassin's Creed production to.
But up until now, they've been improving a lot with each iteration and giving massive contents unlike Call of Duty with short SP campaign and a pretty much identical multiplayer.
And Revelations seems to look good too. They have already far more new features announced than MW3: hookblade and its new movements, bomb crafting, Assassin's Den, this customizable ani...
yep nothing new here :(
He quoted the article
They don't need him.
If i recall correctly, they were xbox button icons on the screen...
It's made by Techland not Ubisoft (well, they publish it though).
Developing Dead Island at the same time must not have helped them...
yep, they sure don't need testers to tell them if graphics are good or crap, DICE's men got eyes too.
Oh, glowing MW3 logo. That's cool
Lol wut? What does your last sentence has to do with any of this?
I know it's not EA who's doing this and thank god it isn't. I'm just saying for an average customer or any other people who would intentionally go to modernwarfare3.com, it would be perceived as a cheap trick and they doesn't care if it's EA or their fans who are doing it.
Still, I agree that Activision are the dumbest in this story for not having registered the domain n...
While I'll definitely be buying BF3 over MW3 this year, I found what they did pretty stupid. It doesn't give a good image to Battlefield 3.
Huh Brotherhood's story was pretty lame... at least compared to the first two games. Still a good game though.
New setting, new hero means we'll get a new ancestor to play with. That's why Brotherhood & Revelations aren't the third, because we're still stucked with Ezio and the Renaissance.
Aw cr*p, I'll have to buy a new sound card or a USB headset I guess. I'm one of the unlucky chaps with a realtek sound chipset having compability issues with punkbuster, causing crashes in multiplayer...
Wow, it looks pretty much difficult. If the guy didn't have this sort of "god mode", he would have died like a thousand times.
Can't wait for it!
how about they make the game first?
I was intrigued, so I verified and L.A. Noire is a registered trademark of Take Two.
http://imageshack.us/photo/...
I'm sure there won't be any "L.A. Noire 2". I mean, who would want to see a sequel of this game in the same city during the same period? That's what the DLCs are already doing.
We'll probably see a similar detective game, a spiritual successor but not in L.A. and not during the 40-50's. Then I wonder what'll happen to yhe rights and IP in that case since they won't probably reuse the name, but the gameplay will be similar...
Also,...
From what I've seen of the multiplayer, if it didn't have HUD I'd make no difference between it and the singleplayer. The scale's so huge, the animations even "simplified" are detailed enough that I would've swear it was a single-player mission:
http://www.dailymotion.com/...
"T-REX INCOMING!!!"
And so was LA Noire's. And they still filmed every faces in the game (during gameplay or cutscene) with their tech because the gap was too big if they had to switch with the traditionnal facing capture technology.