I'd be mad to the person that posted the article because now trolls and fanboys that don't even care about the game will simply watch this stuff and you know the rest do you?
Reviews are not spoilers you silly...
But on PC I can't play with my friends that only have consoles.
Overhyped? Where's the hype anyway? lol
Resistance is a good series but it's not popular and for it to get into the 15 position is a pretty big achievement. COD series is not only a multiplat tittle but the hype is through the roof from casuals to core gamers.
then you really need to play DQVIII because those games hardly had anything to tell. And believe me, I have beaten I through VIII and the only ones I haven't played yet are DQIV and VII but the best so far has been III and VIII. And DQVIII was the first one to actually have a story, all the other are like playing an oldschool Zelda game or Mario. You know the premise is something like: "save the princess" but that is it.
I was ranting on another article about only Wii getting this game but now... Meh. I was expecting something like DQVIII not another quest based DQ with some tacky on-line component. =/
the problem with gaming is that not all the games are on every console. If gaming were more like the PC or the movie industry where you can play every movie on any brand of blu-ray and you can play any PC game on any brand of PC then everybody would be "happy".
the fact that this game is Wii only makes me rage so bad... Why can't they make it for the PS3 too like that port of Tales of Graces? And just like Tales of Graces I bet the game would sell much more on PS3 even thought it has a lower install base.
Why does Square hates the PS3 so much? There are a bunch of Square games that are exclusive to the X360 (Last Remnant, Infinite Undiscovery and the year timed-exclusive Star Ocean IV) and even Mistwalker, a company infused wit...
Lightning is in the game and she's even a playable character...
But what if Sony announces it in 2013 and then comes out in 2014? Unless Sony announces it in 2012 I don't think that it'll be out for 2013 considering that new consoles always come out a year later after its first announcement.
Switching discs on a linear game is not big deal, is not like changing discs takes that much time either. The problem is when devs want to make big games like FF and then they have to scatter it through multiple discs. It's obvious that design choices will have to be made that will affect both consoles and that will make it more linear and limited in the way of how connected the game will be and feel. And the experience will not only feel disjointed but then add the fact about all the con...
Xbox needs blu-ray so third party devs stop gimping games and then offering the leftovers as DLC a day after of its release. Then I wouldn't mind sharing FFvsXIII even though I know Square's gonna gimp it anyway to make it multiplat... =/
I think you mean the "Xbox and GameCube" because the Dreamcast was weak as hell compared to the PS2. Or do you really think that the Dreamcast had the power to run games like God of War and FFXII on progressive scan and wide-screen? Even GT4 was 1080i...
Dreamcast was much easier to develop for but the PS2 was like 2 times more powerful. Just do a google search for specs, comparison of games and what other more knowledgeable people say.
it still going to look fine, the PS Vita screen res is 960×544 not that far away from 1280x720. I mean, Call of Duty games run at 1024x600 you know. =/
Future Vita revisions need an HDMI!
well she looks awfully similar to Capelli's wife! A bit younger though but...
half an hour and that is if a connection error doesn't happen and then it'll be a full hour! =(
200 hundred comments and people still hasn't realized that Cinemablend took the quote out of context for the hits...
not going multi would be a miracle. =0
he has many bubbles so he can afford some trolling.