None of them have been "delayed", so it is obvious that AT LEAST one of them will be. But probably both.
The "bonus" is the ripped content.
You know the sad answer. Btw, if anyone here knows a site with a less biased pool of users to check gaming news, please point it out. I know about one with a much more mature and intelligent community (obviously wont post its name here and risk to contaminate it there with the blind idiocy we see here everyday), but it is not so good for the pure info. I'm primarily a PS4 player, but what happens here is ridiculous.
On topic, Borderlands did the same and they said that t...
In a few years, it will BE the industry.
According to reports on the forums, yes, it is still a poor performance for "such a polished" game.
Won't go back to TW3 today. Waiting on the patch for a decent twitchless performance at least.
Google "cheating" and "farming".
If you still can't see the difference, you're a really lost case.
Fools applaud it, so what do you expect?
Do you think companies will spend money in new games when they can rerelease the same stuff for 10%, if this much, of the cost? When they spend so much in Bloodborne to celebrate the ridiculous amount of one million games sold, after all that marketing?
Why announce new stuff when they also can reannounce the same games and populate every E3 with the same promises every year, when half the big games (probably more) "to be ...
When it comes from certain companies, it is totally acceptable and justified.
When it comes from some others, absolutely outrageous.
And the wheel of lies and deception go round and round, stronger and stronger, with full support from players in zealot mode.
Yeah, why would you play the game when you can cheat?
100% agreed.
TW3 blows lots of games in the overhype scale. Devs themselves blatantly lied about the state of the game. It is far from finished.
The main problem with it is the input lag. The frame rate. It is just poor coding all around heavily impacting the gameplay.
Screw it. Finally the reasonable reviews started appearing.
Mine too. 7 to me fits the game much more than 9.2 (Metacritic), specially if played on consoles and considering the technical aspect.
UE3. smh
It explains a lot.
Still have faith, though.
One has not enough Mad, the other lacks Max.
If anything, the movie proved that even lacking one of the pair, a masterpiece can still be done.
It is a 60 bucks game with a billion microtransactions in it.
"It is needed".
One of them surely is. Free to play schemes on a full priced game is what is charged for this game.
Enjoy it for me as well.
I'm working on my backtrack until they fix the performance, insane stuttering and stuff like that.
This?
Bloating about how perfect, polished and finished their game is, how different and better they are as devs, and then releasing it with severe frame rate instability, stuttering, unreadably small text, a PC UI on console, crashes on Gwent etc.?
These are ALL issues that were obviously present on the game very clearly, not something that needed to be played a million times to happen.
Gamers really deserve what they get.
"So to be clear, this fight is Cleric Beast and Eileen The Crow vs. Father Gascoigne, and 3 Hunter players."
Boss, lured NPC and summoned NPC + 3 players, in case you were wondering.
Cheat.
And also it is a mod, in case console players were thinking about clicking.
2.1 GB, 26th of May.
Usually it is necessary. They let the public reveal to the moment when they have a stable "showable" build.
Think about Bloodborne. It was shown behind closed doors months before the public reveals and the word is that the frame rate was atrocious. Think what could have happened if they had shown this in public.
I don't like it too, but I understand their reasons.