You make me laugh.
Why do take what Nintendo fanboys say so personally? You act like every criticism they have of Sony is a stab and a bullet to your heart. Relax this isn't a gang war. LMAO!
I find it VERY ironic that you quote patcher with that particular statement.
I recall you saying:
"i dont care who posts number losses because im a gamer and only benefit from the company supplying new games on a proper system.&...
It is definitely going to be multiplat unless Sony comes up with a deal.
"Mobile gaming is just creating more casual gamers, whom never bought into dedicated handhelds in the first place."
Bingo.
I have said this numerous amounts of times. Most People that are gaming on their phones, first off, are casual gamers and, second, are those that never bought handhelds in the first place. BUT you still have people that don't acknowledge this fact. =/
BC3 is most likely going to play similar to BF3 because BF3 sold so well.
Yeah, pretty solid in deed.
Now that I see the 3DS numbers I have no idea why people said it flopped in the beginning. Those numbers are solid as well.
EDIT:
@below
Exactly. It was more of a "HA! We are right! Smartphones and tablets are declining mobile gaming!" When in fact when you look at the numbers, The 3DS and Vita only sold a couple 100k less than their previous system's week one sales.
Exactly. Metal Gear Solid has always had a lot of cut scenes and long ones at that. I do admit that MGS4 had too much cut scenes for my taste, especially the ending, but it was necessary imo.
Yeah I needed to make an insane analogy to make you realize your insane statement.
You were basically saying that people shouldn't complain(cry) about having to pay for something that should be free.
Why do you insist to ignore the issue at hand?
I am strictly talking about playing multiplayer online. I am saying that basic feature should be free. Yet you insist on talking about preference. I'm not saying that all of XBL should be free. I'm saying that playing a multiplayer match for lets say Halo or Gears should be free.
You make it sound like you wouldn't be annoyed to pay for XBL even if PSN provided the exact same experience for free. Actu...
So if the government were to make you pay for air you'd be okay with that too right? You wouldn't complain? Just, if I don't like, don't buy it right? looool
Why are you turning this into a fanboy thing?
We are talking strictly talking about XBL being a rip off. If someone games on Live but doesn't use all of it's features are they not getting ripped off?
XBL should have a free membership that only allows for the access of playing games online. So that way those that don't use all of the features of XBL are not shelling out money every just to play a game online.
No, here's the better question,
Name all the features that you pay for that CAN'T be found on PSN.
Also keep mind the things that you are about to list is what you are ACTUALLY paying for.
One more thing you can no longer add cross game chat because the Vita can do that too and so will the PS4....
You didn't read the article.
The author addressed that statement.
~*"* EA seems like they only care about money.”
This was posed as a complaint about the DLC and EA’s other sins, but it’s one of those “well, duh” moments you don’t think about until it’s right in your face.
It just isn’t correct to call these companies evil for attempting to extract more money from their industry. It may be eye rolling or exasperating...
Wow... strongly opinionated are we?... calling other "sports" you don't like BS...
I'm sure you wouldn't like it if someone were to say UFC is nothing but a "who can hug the other man longer" sport now would you?
You should really respect all "sports" as all of them require hard work and dedication.
I wouldn't be fast to say that. NBA 2K13 could take the cake.
Every CoD is better than the one after it, like so:
COD4 > MW2 > Black Ops > MW3
Yeah, I think it's safe to say now that Patcher rarely, if ever, has any idea about what he is talking about.
All credibility is lost once he said Nintendo needed to be saved. LMAO!
My ideal price for games are:
Consoles $40
Handheld $20-30
Killzone as a SERIES isn't dead... at least not yet. If KZ4 goes back to KZ2 roots the mutiplayer will surely be alive and well. Killzone 3 itself is dead though.
How am I being a fanboy?
EA can continue to make football games. I just want 2K to be able to make football game too. Is that wrong?
In my opinion madden games have been going south ever since they were the only ones allowed to make football game. 2K being able to make football games again will allow for good competition.
Are you serious?
Is it not frustrating that one has to buy a new console in order to play a new Kingdom Hearts game?
The only KH spin-off I bought was chain of memories. The rest I did not play because it would be foolish for me to buy a new handheld just to play ONE game.
I'm hopping SE does a HUGE Kingdom Hearts collection that brings KH1, KH2, Chain of Memories, Re:coded, 358/2 Days, Birth by Sleep, and Dream Drop Distance all to conso...