GT5 looks awesome, but take a GT5 screen shot and see if anyone can tell if it is the game or real life. It will be ridiculously easy. It's gonna be a lot harder on the real screen shot because people are expecting GT5 to look good, and have no clue as to how good the final product will look.
She is soo gross.
Overwieght pale dinnerplates FTW.
@ zootang
No one is saying that they don't want free online multiplayer. That doesn't mean it isn't worth paying for.
Sinclair you hit the nail on the head. XBL was FAR better than PSN when it came out. With that said, there was absolutely no way that Sony could charge for it. The Sony fanboys here at N4G mistake that for the love that they think Sony has for them.
no matter how much you guys b*tch, the fact is XBL has more unique paying subscriptions than PSN has unique subscriptions. Take your complaints elsewhere.
If PSN was the original console MP service then they would be charging as well.
Live cost $50 when it came out 7 years ago. Even though the service has gotten drastically better since then, they have not increased the price once. In fact, you can get XBL cheaper now than you could then. Someone please expla...
BFBC2 is P2P???? Sounds likes its the devs choice.
Try again.
First of all I didn't hit disagree. Second, its not like you have never hit disagree without leaving a response.
I responding to the_only_lol_king's response to how he doesn't think it should matter how you look while using 3D glasses in your home no matter how ridiculous it looks.
No where in my comment do I say "why do you hate on Kinect because you looks just as rediculous while wearing 3D glasses"
If you find that let me know...
I don't know how developed Sony's auto sterioscopic tech is, but this seems like a way to get their hands on it.
and yet i am still enjoying both exclusive and multiplatform games on my 360
It looks like a game that's been in development for 8 month, but on purpose, but it doesn't play like a game 8 months in development.
Same goes with Kinect, but somehow that gets sh*t on because you might look funny while using it.
Fact is, you usually don't play video games with the intentions of impressing someone else around you. Wearing 3D glasses won't fail because they look weird, but instead because its a huge nuisance.
Because he said he was an Xbot in the beginning his statement is now relevant?
Gullible.
"its ok..."
not to disagree, but you played through the demo 3 times...
You are over simplifying it. Its not getting good deals for free. Its paying $50 dollars and getting good deals. You don't pay gamestop for a buy one get one free service.
I read your comment and it talks mostly about how one game should or shouldn't be in the numerical position it is in. I think you are now just trying to make your dumb comment sound less dumb by going after the guy who made you look like a fool.
Nice stealth edit btw.
lol true...but someone did agree with Danteh
@cgoodno
i would love to see someone explain the disagrees
At least someone is saying it...Bubbles.
If it had been MS telling one of their first party devs to focus on Kinect instead of extra content, the PS3 fanboys would be saying more than "Oh Well" and "That Sucks".
Touche, but PSN+ is still new and should get questioned (on an information gathering basis) more than something that is not new.
I really think you are taking it a little bit more personally than you should. It's N4G and if everyone had their way when it comes to what articles don't approved there would be no articles.
"PS3/PS+ fanboys who will not listen to any dissenting point of view about PS+, not even if that voice of dissent is another PS3 gamer."
Substitute PS+ with PS3, then you are in my world.
"PS3 fanboys who will not listen to any dissenting point of view about PS3, not even if that voice of dissent is another PS3 gamer.
wow, people already calling it the iphone killer. Gotta love Sony fanboys. People don't get iPhones for games.