A dictionary definition of law has nothing to do with what we are talking about lol. Statutory law and constitutional law are two completely different things. You are coming at this with the perception that they are the same. Yes, statutory law is created by congress. Constitutional law is determined by the courts. That's not what you said.
Yes statutes are bound by the fundamental laws of our constitution. They are not "lesser laws" or "judicial interpr...
"The smaller statutes are later interpretations or rulings of judges who have added their own definition of said constitutional freedom."
This is also false. Judges rule on constitutional law. Statutes are detailed laws written by congress. Constituitional law is not determined by statutes just as statutes are not created by judicial interpretation.
"That's actually exactly what it means."
No it doesn't actually. You are wrong.
"The only "absolute" rights are defined by the Constitution of the United States."
There are no such thing as absolute rights. Article 5 clearly states the amendment procedures to repeal any right. You could repeal due process if you had enough states to go along with it.
"The smaller statutes are later interpretatio...
It is in a sense. A company can fire whoever it wants, that's not the issue. There should also be consequence for libel. When these media outlets savage people with their left wing hackery they should be taken to court and stripped of a pound of flesh. If a company fires you because of a media smear campaign and they are worried about "portrayal" they should be taken to task financially and made an example of. Especially by the more prosperous youtubers that get attacked like pe...
@theundertaker
Yes defamation is hard to prove but so is calling someone a racist. In a previous thread I put links to government statistic sources to coincide with the remarks he said.
Calling someone a racist in a smear campaign with absolutely no evidence besides your disagreement with factual statistics is a defamation case that can be won. It is a false statement, that caused the loss of employment.
Yes it's not a constitutional right. ...
That's not true. If a publication smears the shit out of you as a racist because of your opinion that doesn't align with there's and you lose your job because of it you can sue for defamation.
No rights were violated, that's true. Free speech protects you against government prosecution. That doesn't mean there aren't statues of protection against shit like this.
Oh really. A patented lipstick design? Prove it.
@imo
That's absolutely not true. You could not point to a shred of evidence for your opinion. Black ghettos are not the result of capitalism. The only capitalism going on in black cities is the black market. Those are obviously the most "free markets" available but they are also against the law. Hence the higher incarceration rate, which is my point. Socialism has done more damage to the black community than Jim Crow ever did, its fact.
> Hired a YouTube personality
> Fired for showing personality on YouTube
Ooooooookay. Yeah, ultimately the right decision....
From the gizmondo source this article used:
"Jafari also claimed that wealthy black Americans commit more crimes than poor whites (citation badly needed)"
That's true if you combine all black people into one lump sum like leftists do. What does wealth have to do with anything? Lol.. 82% of black crimes are federal offenses. Blacks keep up with other races in violent crime despite being only 14% of the population. This isn't racism, it's statis...
"Her work". Why are you acting like they broke copyright laws with a fucking lipstick option lol? Wow she's so ticked they stole her work and used it without her permission....
Sure lol. In a world where kids are getting in trouble for calling someone a "Hanzo Main". Divine comedy.
Isn't twitter failing? They just got caught using a bunch of fake users to boost traffic lol. Nothing good has ever came out of twitter yet somehow their behavior is the standard of measure in culture and society lol. Stupid people.
I don't even know who that is but I lose respect for anyone that caves to these morons.
It's not gamers it's twitter. Everyone on twitter is "toxic".
I don't know what she is and I honestly don't care lol. Her personality made her great, the superficial skin deep nonsense never mattered before. It still doesn't in my view.
I thought I read somewhere that this spinoff was in India and it made it seem like she was going "home".
Easily the worst character in the uncharted franchise. Everything was forced, even the outcomes of your fights. It wasn't natural like Chloe in uncharted 2. You didn't hear this diversity crap when uncharted 2 came out. "Indian representation". Nobody gave a shit, she was just a great character.
That's what I meant by intersectional garbage. Chloe is a great individual. She didn't represent the entirety of the Indian population. It's complete n...
The whole representation thing is a laughable joke. Intersectionalist blow hards who like the smell of their own shit. People that think "social science" is in any way scientific. Complain about social constructs while obsessing over identity like a cult formed religion. Look up "intersectionalist" if you want, these people are open segregationists and bigots hiding behind a fake moral superiority. Dive down that rabbit hole to understand these retards in the media and aca...
I like the look of a lot of those. The one that really stands out for me is project x by komogames(?). It has the crouching tiger feel and could be the Chinese nioh for me. It didn't look as polished as a team ninja game but it looked fun. China should absolutely make the next jade empire instead of bioware. I hope those Chinese devs do well and create more titles for the west. I always thought Chinese devs focus more on the local online and mobile markets, so good on Sony if they took th...
"...Uh, no, not quite. It's even intertwined with the oath to become a judge or justice... "
you don't get it... yes it's intertwined. They are two different fields of expertise lol. Yes every judge takes oath to uphold and protect the constitution. So does every politician and soldier. This has nothing to do with what we are talking about. Creating law and determining the constitutionality of law are completely different things. Statutory law is not constitutio...