sknr.net +
Story quality? WTF?
Like this website? NO
Sorry (actually I'm not) but if you purposely choose to report something COMPLETELY inaccurately then you are not speaking the truth, and thus have weak principles, low ethics + no credibility in my eyes, and that's not the kind of information I care for nor am willing to support.
I believe the translation would be ~
"Dude! <I am> re buying <it, since I> sold my xbox copy for a next gen version."
I thought angelsx comment was funny. But that's just me.
@ HiddenMission
There is an exception to your rule ~
"The big 3 use sold through to customer to illustrate customer base. They use ship to retailer to obscure the actual customer base and all 3 do this when they're not in 1st or beating their competitor. "
Sony is that exception. They have shown to be the one that consistently shows Sell Through even when behind. The previous gen of PS3 sales figures released proves this. Which ...
Some people just don't want to hear it though Digi...no matter what amount of facts, links, documented history or otherwise you can prove.
Phenomenal. You are so full of it "XGamer".
You have been registered here since June 1st, 2006 <even before myself> and full well know that N4G is not as you say, a "Fony Sony website". You know exactly what happened around here last gen and by being here long enough you absolutely know the truth. Whether you admit that to yourself or not is something only you can deal with.
Article Headline ~
"Destiny 2 Already in The Works; Activision Releases Financial Results..."
I am referring to his original post (not the edit/replies of which was provoked by the following comments) because it's about Destiny & Activisions financial sales. So while he may not be 100% on topic as you believe, he absolutely is WAAAAY further on topic than the others.
Again let me clarify, you don't have to like him perso...
So let me recap & get this straight ~
TheWatercooler posts his comment (which was ON TOPIC by the way, as per the crux of the article) and then the immediate next 6 posts were either
a) Immature
b) Trolling
c) Personal Attacks
d) COMPLETELY Off topic
e) or a combination of the above actions
Yet those same posters are usually the first ones/types to bi@!#%, cry & complain all over N4G about how they have...
So let me get this straight Edonus & Jumper09 ~ something you haven't tried nor experienced you automatically know will be "downgraded/laggy" yet when the same is said about how the XB1's Cloud experience could potentially be the same (you know because up/down speed + latency dependent upon users etc) then it's somehow not the same, right?
Dat damage control is in full effect...just that it's people like you doing their damnedest at it.
LoL @ "salty sony fanboys"...more like blindly biased immature Xbox trolls who crapped all over Insomniac being "mediocre" last gen who are now touting this as the next savior of the XB1.
And no I am not even trying to imply SO is crap. I absolutely enjoyed previous Insomniac titles but looking at SO with an open mind it's really not hard to see it's not their strongest/best work.
Would I pick it up as Angeljuice described (second ...
Boy do you have a short memory!
Last gen those same 360 owners RIGHT HERE ON N4G held that over PS3 owners as a negative (just as you are trying & failing to do right now)...but since the proverbial "shoe is on the other foot" those same gamers contradict themselves when the XB1 is proven to be slower under equal comparatives this gen.
Hypocritical immature drivel to the Nth degree.
@Gaming247allday - Sorry but that ever so awesome "Warranty" you speak of was $#@! for some (like me) here's my ordeal ~
I had my 360 fail 6 times. Granted I was a special case (though I have read of others) that got royally screwed in the FACT that when the 360 launched it came with an industry first of being sold with ONLY a 90 day warranty (which we all know why) and mine failed just after that warranty period thus MS would NOT cover it...so I hit the forums ...
Completely agree Eonjay ~ It's so obvious, but tbh that kind of critical thinking is lost on some...which speaks VOLUMES if you ask me.
@ Kayant & Alexious ~ Exactly my point (albeit less confusing). I think people mistook my point simply because the XB1 CPU is shown to be capable of doing "more" in a 1 : 1 basis versus the PS4 (in this example referenced in the article)...but when you factor in the rest of the whole system the output of the PS4 is MUCH larger/greater (and by FAR too) which is vastly more important.
The PS4 CPU @ 98 vs the XB1 CPU @ 113 proves that the "higher clock speed" of the XB1 is completely negligible. The PS4 GPGPU and just overall throughput of the PS4 says ALOT when it comes to the performance capabilities between the two (a fact known to those who understand hardware/tech).
@ kaiserfranz ~ I agree to an extent (i.e. putting a slightly better CPU in both consoles) but not fully as a system is more than just the CPU, it's the culmination of it'...
Said it the other day so I'll just re-post it for those who DON'T (more like choose to not) get it...and boy are there a lot of you on here ~
Anyone who understands tech architecture & how hardware components actually work will always choose bigger throughput over slightly faster Clock Speed ~ and that's what it boils down to...A few measly MHz! That is NOT a real world advantage! There is no way possible that a larger throughput would be outclassed by a low %...
How can ANYONE disagree with that factually correct statment?!
I would categorize it a step beyond delusion maybe borderline cognitive dissonance ~
“Sometimes people hold a core belief that is very strong. When they are presented with evidence that works against that belief, the new evidence cannot be accepted. It would create a feeling that is extremely uncomfortable, called cognitive dissonance. And because it is so important to protect the core belief, they will rationalize, ignore and even deny anything that doesn't fit in with ...
* I think you meant 745 of 1k ~ other than that your point is sound.
ANYONE who understands tech architecture & how hardware components actually work will always choose bigger throughput over slightly faster Clock Speed ~ and that's what it boils down to...A few measly MHz! That is NOT a real world advantage! There is no way possible that a larger throughput would be outclassed by a low % increase in Clock Speed. It's physically impossible.
The only additional comment I would like to add on this topic is that you can really see who...
@ Immorals ~ If you are going to use a quote to try and make some sort of poignant "example" then at least get the quote right...
Point being that during an interview with Japanese economic website Toyo Keizai it was Ken Kutaragi that was misquoted about the PS3: "for consumers to think to themselves 'I will work more hours to buy one'. We want people to feel that they want it, irrespective of anything else."
Working more hours =/=...