I enjoy my 360. . .Problem?

Number_13

Contributor
CRank: 5Score: 6160

More than some other recently released PS3 game so maybe they should have hired him to make it. . .or was that your point?

5244d ago 1 agree16 disagreeView comment

Oh lighten up, this article is far from flamebait. Ps3 owners are obviously not bothered by Gears 3 being 360 exclusive, why would this cause anyone any grief?

5244d ago 4 agree3 disagreeView comment

xbox 360 doesn't play Blu-ray movies.

5244d ago 3 agree10 disagreeView comment

Yup, bet you they all have interior views too.
#joking.

5244d ago 0 agree1 disagreeView comment

I doubt that, it's all hype - meaning you think it's lies
Or
I doubt that it is all hype - meaning you don't think they are lying.
Which is it?

5244d ago 0 agree2 disagreeView comment

PS3 exclusive, so when he says there's no beta, it becomes a generally acceptable practice on N4G. Now there are going to be hundreds of comments agreeing with David and showing us proof on why betas are bad.
Later on when he changes his mind or another ps3 exclusive gets a beta, the same people are going to tell us how awesome betas are and why they are absolutely a must for any multiplayer game and that SONY is awesome for doing that.
FACT.

5244d ago 5 agree5 disagreeView comment

Alright then. GOTY confirmed.
Ok not really confirmed so please don't skin me.

5244d ago 2 agree3 disagreeView comment

What exactly does "almost better" mean? Does it mean worse, the same or better?
Usually when someone says "I almost beat you" I say, "but you didn't, I beat you."
Same thing?

5244d ago 2 agree4 disagreeView comment

Loosely translated: it isn't going to happen any time soon, if ever.

5244d ago 1 agree2 disagreeView comment

Yeah, and "I did not have sexual relations with that woman."
In other words. . . http://www.youtube.com/watc...

5244d ago 7 agree16 disagreeView comment

Um. . .Agent? Lol come on people, seriously?? What exactly about Agent is stunning? The logo?? This is where it starts people, hype. Just because it is an exclusive title does not automatically mean greatness. Too Human and Socom 4 can attest to that.

5244d ago 10 agree10 disagreeView comment

So if you aren't a PS3 owner the games don't look awesome? That doesn't right.

5244d ago 3 agree29 disagreeView comment

Lol and I buy Playboys for the articles.

5244d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

Yeah. . .except SONY funded this game, not Insomniac. So in the end, SONY are the ones paying for the spite of ps3 fanboys. Unless Insomniac get paid on commission, they've been paid for their job already. Your rebellion doesn't hurt them as much as it hurts your master.
@Jack, CoD, FIFA, Assassin's Creed, Battlefield ect. take a huge dump on that different demographic, cautious, 25 year old theory big time.

5244d ago 2 agree5 disagreeView comment

Lol, perv.

5244d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

@Army of Darkness, that would make sense if Resistance 3 belonged to Insomniac, it doesn't, it belongs to SONY, ie they FUNDED it. It doesn't make business sense to ignore a project you paid millions for simply because the 2nd party you hired to do the job is working on their own project as well.
SONY aren't as petty as their fanboys, they wouldn't do something so stupid.
@M-Easy common sense dictates what is expected and I can assure you SONY didn't go i...

5244d ago 10 agree6 disagreeView comment

Because making fun of CoD makes it all better. . .

5244d ago 5 agree5 disagreeView comment

M-Easy
Flop in this case is selling significantly lower than expected for a AAA budget exclusive game sequel.
@darkride below, the first Resistance was a LAUNCH title. There weren't 20 million ps3's in the US as there are now so initial sales were expectedly low.
That coupled with the fact that there were not alot of games on ps3 led to it eventually to its high lifetime sales.
Resistance 2 didn't sell as much as the first and now Resistance 3 s...

5244d ago 12 agree6 disagreeView comment

Alright, if I must: Quality.

5244d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Lol no way. In a good way.

5244d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment