All Channels
Popular
snoffle snoffle snoffle

Nicaragua

Contributor
CRank: 5Score: 100490

The EA access official site lists it as 4.99 per month, thats 60 per year

http://www.ea.com/eaaccess/

There is only one price shown and it is the norm to advertise the lowest possible price, so if EA says its 5 bucks per month then thats what it is.

4327d ago 0 agree5 disagreeView comment

But digital EA games are stupidly priced so that discount probably wont even get them on par with store prices - is that really worth paying for?

4327d ago 3 agree4 disagreeView comment

It honestly doesnt sound that great to me - 60 bucks a year to play old EA games that are already going on sale and a 10 percent discount on new EA games ?

I can only imagine that the 10 percent discount is gonna be for digital games which EA already way overprices compared to retail, so in order for this thing to break even then you are gonna have to buy a lot of EA games every year - and even then i doubt you would get the same value if you had just gone into a store.

4327d ago 0 agree8 disagreeView comment

They cant because the sauce bottle was stacked on top of the hidden GPUGPU, which is too high for the extra compute units to tron.

4328d ago 18 agree6 disagreeView comment

I totally agree with this review.

I was a huge fan of the original Strider but this new attempt feels like it has completely missed the point. The original was about skill and fluid movement, this is about chaotic button mashing.

4335d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

What an incredibly naive blog.

This stuff happens everywhere, and i think its fun so fuck off.

4340d ago 1 agree3 disagreeView comment

@OpieWinston

that comment shows a frightening lack of understanding for what Microsoft are attempting to do.

The resulting server calculations have to come back into the game engine and then be rendered by the graphics engine, it is in no way the same as simply streaming the video to a device.

personally i think its total bollocks.

4346d ago 23 agree12 disagreeView comment

Lack of a campaign didnt hurt Counterstrike, Team Fortress, Planetside, Dota2 and a shitload of other superb games. Also games like Battlefield 3/4 and Starhawk that didnt need a campaign but got one anyway are worse for it.

If there is a story to tell and the devs want to tell it then fine, but its not essential.

4360d ago 4 agree3 disagreeView comment

I wouldnt say the multiplayer is underrated, it certainly doesnt get as much praise as the campaign but those who have played it tend to rave about it.

For me it was my 2nd favourite multiplayer of last gen after Metal Gear Online.

4371d ago 10 agree4 disagreeView comment

I tend to find Ubisoft games incredibly bland and lacking in depth, which is shame because the concepts are usually very cool.

Its for this reason i dont think The Division will be anything special.

4371d ago 6 agree3 disagreeView comment

I liked the first one so i hope this is true

4380d ago 6 agree0 disagreeView comment

Personally I think a starfox/metroid crossover would be horrible, the two universes are just too different.

Samus already has a gunship so there is no need to have fox for air battles.

4387d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I completely disagree.

In no other industry would that be an acceptable mindset.

Restaurant-sorry your meal was literally shit, you should have done more research.

Builders-sorry we completely ruined the structural integrity of your house, you should have done more research.

If you buy a game on steam it should at least be a functioning game, and a lot aren't - that's the problem.

4388d ago 1 agree10 disagreeView comment

Casuals can be aware of a game which is announced and released within a 12 month cycle - just like at Call of Duty, Assassins Creed, Uncharted 2, or any of the yearly sports games to see this is true.

I would also argue that a casual is even less likely to be influenced by early drip feeding marketing because they make their purchasing decisions within a very short time span based on adverts on tv or word of mouth from what their friends are playing - so i think its a moot po...

4388d ago 1 agree1 disagreeView comment

I agree. It seems like games are being revealed too early and in lttle drips just to give the new era of internet journalism something to report on each day.

Its not just expectations that are the problem, I actually think that revealing soomething too early is counterproductive for marketing the game. People were starting to get burnt out on Watch Dogs pre launch due to the over hype and the same can be said of Destiny which feel like it was revealed 14 years ago.
...

4390d ago 4 agree1 disagreeView comment

£46 is how much games cost in the UK, so its neither a good or bad deal - its just the price of a game.

4394d ago 0 agree0 disagreeView comment

I think he his talking about success in terms of how well it did on Kickstarter, rather than the finished product being a success.

4394d ago 2 agree0 disagreeView comment

Honestly Dragon I have no idea what you are rattling on about.

You are entitled to your opinion on Sessler, Anita Sarkeesian, me, and anyone else.
Snookies is entitled to love everyone on the planet and believe in whatever supernatural force they choose to.

And should they choose to broadcast those ideologies toward me in a comment on a video games forum then I am entitled to tell them to stick it up their turd pipe.

Thankfully you ha...

4394d ago 11 agree12 disagreeView comment

Love is limited, it is a valuable resource and so I choose to spend it wisely rather than dilute its value by handing it out to shitty game journalists like Sessler or any other stranger.

That is how I choose to live my life so kindly stick your god and blessings right up your poo chute :)

4395d ago 14 agree22 disagreeView comment

I save my love for people close to me that I actually like.

4395d ago 15 agree6 disagreeView comment