Having to render the entire Battlefield 2, 3, or 4 times at once would degrade the visuals to hell. Plus split-screen BF just isn't a good idea at all.
Most BF games have been MP only. Don't like it, leave. Go play CoD lol.
Apparently people forgot that CS is actually all about the gameplay, NOT the graphics. It's a 100% competitive shooter.
A lot better than the atrocious photoshop job PAL version. It actually features rain prominently on the cover, and the pose of Murphy suggests he has a darker side to him. UK cover was just a random monster and a creepy postman on the side.
Let's see, buy an iPad 2 and play shitty games, or build a gaming PC for the same price this year and play a massive fuckload of awesome games?
Decisions, decisions...
I remember seeing the game a long time ago. It looked okay but I didn't think much of it. Played that demo and wondered why the score was like 2.2/5 on the Store. Played it...Just wow. Such a trash game. Dunno how they dropped the ball with it.
STALKER was post-apocalypse and it wasn't anywhere close to all-brown. Love that series.
PS Vita? Already a day-one buy.
Tekken on Vita? Another day-one buy.
Yeah that's one thing that made CoD zombies get old real fast. Not being able to survive no matter what and being forever confined to an enclosed arena. With Battlefield, you could have an entire town full of zombies and you could just choose when to leave that current area. Imagine that... I'd gladly pay for that DLC.
Get outta here fanboy. There's no point in having the devs do carbon copies of SH1-3 forever and ever. Go back and worship those games, but don't insult the devs just because they had the balls to try something new.
How did they mess up the entire series by remastering two old-ass games and changing the voice acting? It's not even that big of a fucking deal, it's not like these characters were in every game of the series or anything. SH3 at least had actual good voice acting in it. SH4 was pretty cringe-worthy as well. Origins and onward had pretty good acting.
Survival against dinosaurs? I'd take that over boring zombies any day. The whole zombie thing was cool a few years ago, but zombies has gotten old just like WW2 shooters did.
Even then, it'll boil down to weapon skill. It only takes one shot to kill a guy, and even though the guy with the M16 will have more firepower due to a higher-capacity mag and burst-fire/full-auto, the M1 guy can still annihilate him.
Take one guy who knows what he's doing with an M1 Garand, then face him up against a careless sprayer with an M16, and see who wins. The M1 is still a great rifle, which the M14 and it's other derivatives was based off of.
Hell they'll give you like $.25 for PS2 and Xbox games. They gave my friend like $6 for Mirror's Edge. :|
Last I checked on amazon, they had the prices slashed down to like $40. Get 'em while they're hot.
Nah, I'd rather give that title to someone like Valve, id, or Gearbox. IW was cool but they never did anything innovative, not even with the early CoD games.
It's cool ;)
Wow, read the first line.
"Tomorrow, August 25th, PlayStation home is set to receive another exciting, ***FREE*** release. "
That demo was abysmal, no way I'd even pay $20 for it.