First of all they didn't STEAL anything and it's retarded to even suggest it. Secondly, whether you like the idea or not, it's still huge news and nothing that came after it even came close.
And it's not just FF XIII that people are saying they one for. That was the knockout blow, for sure, but they really showed a lot, like the article said, of great 3rd party titles, WITH RELEASE DATES, and also the Live update which is going to be pretty impressive. Is it Home? Nope, but then ...
I wouldn't exactly call what Nintendo has now "support"...No more than I'd call a gold digging alcoholic "supportive".
Exactly...This is what I get the least. I really can't wrap my brain around the rationale that a Sony fanboy is genuinely PISSED that 360 owners are getting this game. PS3 is still getting it and they're getting it developed on their system of choice.
I can honestly say that if there is a delay for the 360 version then I'm getting the PS3 one. Which I might have gotten anyway because I just see it running better on it. But man, these butt hurt Sony fanboys are all kinds of silly....
OR, the marketing geniuses looked at EVERY other FF off chute (X2, Dirge, Crisis Core) and saw how poorly they fared so they decided it wasn't worth it. But I do find it funny that you said "I guess there is some loyalty for Sony because MS couldn't pay enough to get it"...Seriously? So loyalty only goes so far as how much they can get paid? Do you even know what "loyalty" means?
"Microsoft is what happened.
Ever since they entered the console wars they've been ruining everything. Stealing exclusives because they have none, buying good reviews, etc."
I can't believe people think this stuff let alone type it for the world to see.
Ruining everything? What have they ruined? Your dreams? Because games have never been better so I fail to see what and how they ruined ANYTHING.
Stealing exclusives? Are you that m...
Actually, it wasn't a price drop for the 80 gig...They're just upping the HD space on the 40 gig. It's the same unit (2 usb, no backward compatibility) only 2x the space.
MAG rips every game a new one, huh? And you know this from a developer stating his PLANS and an extremely pre-rendered game trailer? Sony fanboys are so transparent.
You have no clue how the game is or is going to play.
So I add to what someone else said and I get 2 disagrees and he gets none...I really wish this site wouldn't allow anonymous disagrees. I'd really love to pick the brain of some these people. It'd be like a science experiment.
Yes it does, in fact, take less time to change discs than to install any PS3 game. Unless of course you move slower than a minute across the room, then you would have to disagree.
You'll hate MS forever if the game is delayed? Why bother saying something so stupid? It's obvious you hate them forever right now.
Personally I couldn't care less. I'm getting what ever version hits first. If it's the same day, I'll choose then.
Microsoft won in terms of big surprises....I don't care what Sony fanboy disagrees, but seeing FFXII with a 360 logo following it was major.
In terms of games on display it's a tie that round because of Fallout 3, Resident Evil 5 and Gears of War 2...
I'm not convinced that MAG is worthwhile yet because PSN has a tough enough time with games like COD 4...Let alone 256 players at once...But Ratchet and Clank is a must buy (if they get their act together and implemen...
I totally agree...FF XIII looks amazing and it's on a PS2. Yes, this will look better, but the CG scenes are all pre-rendered anyway. And for those that complain about changing discs...It takes less time to swap discs and load than it does for the install. It's not a big deal.
How is it stupid for them to make more money?
Uhm....So far every game on 360 looks just as good and plays at a higher res than on PS3. If anyone is worried about the graphics taking a hit, they're really, REALLY stupid.
The game is terrible. I just wish IW and Activision would do something about the modded controllers used in COD4.
Battlefield is terrible. The guns do sh!t for damage. The controls are slow and clumsy, Yeah, the maps are huge but you spend just as much time traveling across desert or through woods. The graphics are mediocre at best. What a waste of $70 (I bought the Gold Edition)...Even the single player was horrible.
COD 4 is WAY better. I really gotta try to get into MGSO. I played the Beta and was underwhelmed but people tell me it's great.
Left 4 Dead, Fable 2, Infinite Undiscovery, and Gears 2 are all looking good. I've never played a Tales or Banjo game but they do look really good as well. I really couldn't care less about the other 3.
This looks fantastic.
@ Darrius Cole
See, that's the beauty of film, they won't need all that overly dramatic expository monologues that the game has. The only reason why it's that long is because people go on and on about things already discussed. A good filmmaker will make it concise. And hopefully they never once mention the Le Li La Le Lo or whatever the hell that stupidity was.
But it's illegal to do so...The fact that I could go to jail for playing a game that some sh!tty government decided was inappropriate for ME is reason enough. Revolt or something. The way they are disgusts me.
So, if MS "STOLE" an exclusive....And yes "stole" is what Sony fanboys have been crying about for days, then how could Sony have known about it?