I'm really looking forward to seeing what they show for this game.
While I agree with the general consensus that Bethesda do release buggy games, I've had a blast with them having joined the fandom at morrowind on PC.
I only own one console which is a playstation and due to money, it would take a hell of a lot for me to invest in a second console along with the monthly subs etc. So I'm personally gutted about the acquisition here.
Think you've conveniently skipped over all the points being made Obscure and chose to focus on game length and replay value.
The points being made were regarding the marketing campaign leading to the release, and in this case one game is due in the year 2023, the other is due in the next few months and has, according to this article, had its latest reveal pushed.
Looks to be fixed now
Got to say Christopher, you've been on the ball during this transition.
Well played
Was just thinking this! I clicked to see what was happening
Great point! Websites that display their content across multiple pages for clicks and ad revenue are trash.
It's a tought one I guess. Does N4G outright ban them and take away the choice of viewing? Or do they maybe add a new warning *multiple pages* on the preview/comments page
This article is an example if taking an interview that we've already had posted and splitting it down into tiny quotes to make several more articles.
Something that should be banned on this site across the board. Just post the original interview without all the narration.
The harder part to workout us the consoles sold, the psn memberships sold and subsequent other sales made off the back of having COD on the system.
Factors beyond just CODS profit, it's the ripple effect.
Acquisitions happen for sure, but monopolies are throwned upon
@optimus, explain where the competition is in one company buying up all the big 3rd party publishers with the idea of making all games exclusive?
Competition is a level playing field. Not buying all the land up and stopping the rest from playing on it.
I'd argue that in this particular case, Microsoft is the bully. Not only to the industry by purchasing up and attempting to make some of the biggest 3rd party games exclusive to their console but when challenged on this bad practice, they then bully the opposition and those that oppose them.
Just look at Koticks interviews this week and how he is threatening the power of China or how he is belittling the UK for opposing the deal.
Look at how Microsoft...
Objecting to a purchase of this scale isn't playing the victim, it is protecting your business and the hard work you've put into it over the decades.
Get a new word because victim isn't it.
Obscurer, you're saying an awful lot without talking much sense at all.
VR isn't a distraction, neither does it take games away from playstation. Sony have been building and harnessing studios just for this while working on their 1st party none VR titles.
Microsoft is fully committed to gamepass and that's fine for them and those that like to game that way. It will be an even better product if Microsoft can nail their 1st party games.
...
One man defence in the comments as always.
Planting green seeds...
I can't believe that there is another article about this fake geezer.
Propaganda is a dangerous weapon, especially when it is utilised by one.
IT'S A TRAP!!
Focus on quality and not quantity. Too many of your titles moved into the same category but under a new skin.
People may disagree but for me, ghost recon suffered from this. Everything that made that game what it was on PC was stripped as it was thrown into the division/assasins/ watch dogs style of game play.
Originality is desperately needed beyond concept