Can't say I'm shocked. I've been around since around 2007-2008, under a username "No Way" (don't remember the password, though). But, this site has seemed DOA for a while now. Server issues, obstructive mobile ad popups, and the lack of comments only brings me here maybe once a week, anymore.
Now that comments (and the community) will be gone; I probably won't have much need to visit again. Bummer.
Bad choice. Should have w...
Yup. Used to be 100's of comments; but now lucky to see 10 in there, 😂
This, as others have already said, is the reason this game will never really *really* improve..
Like what?
Blah blah blah. They could vet and hire good talent, then could rearrange and had a smaller group working on it. The money was in GTA Online, why would they stray from that? Bully was more of a niche, but many people were asking for it - and we still, after all these years, don't have it.
Looking forward to Agefield, though. I'll buy that game to support their vision, which Rockstar failed to do.
It's kinda nonsense, I feel. They made more than enough profits from GTA 5 - and from RDR2 I'm sure - that they could've hired more people to make the project happen.
They could've likely also taken people away from the monetization of GTA5 online and worked on Bully (or proper GTA5 expansions). But they chose GTA5 online.
Why not, like, make a new game or something instead of just banking off cheap remakes? Already played them.. don't need to spend more money to play again. Remakes/remasters are some the biggest scams..
Based on premise and concept alone, this is one of the only games I was looking forward to from Microsoft - besides Fable. Here's to hoping that doesn't get cancelled, 😂
@Anast - it actually doesn't. It's up to the developer have much quality they want their game to be. But, let's look at for example.. Concord. Sony's PS5 game that shuttered after, what, a few weeks? What's the exuse/reason there?
It's a cop out to say it lowers the quality - just to push your narrative. Not to mention that 'quality' is subjective to each person.
It's cool, I'll pass. 🤷♂️
Exactly. They'll just release an OLED model later to get people to jump back in and buy more hardware.
🏴☠️🏴☠️
I can't imagine how a single-player IP would somehow be able to compete with COD. That really doesn't make a lot of sense..
@GamerRN - Maybe the auto industry, with the Ford/Chevy rivalry. But, that's about all I can think of, otherwise.
Understood. I can see what you're saying; but, still it's a visual style that some will appreciate and some won't. Its different, in video game sense, so I feel it's worth keeping an eye on, at the least.
It's okay to not like the art style, but I think it looks fantastic and refreshing. That's the thing about opinions though..
Who are they and why is it a concern to you?
Unfortunately, I'm inclined to agree.. graphically, it looks dated. I'm sure it will still have the potential to be a great game, as I thoroughly enjoyed Outer Space, so time will tell.
Just graphically, it looks dated.
Concord was kinda like.. when you see a girls profile picture and she looks gorgeous, but then you see her on your date and you're like "nah, Shrekina, I'm here to meet Shakira!"
The cinematic trailer looked fantastic and set up to be something great. Looked like it had a story and likeable characters. Like an RPG or something..
The gameplay trailer.. didn't look too hot. Not a fan, huge disappointment after that trailer.
💯