If implemented and calibrated right, it was vastly superior for first person shooters than analog stick aim. Headshots were so easy and you never over or undertracked.
900p is fine. They're $400 boxes. Just give me 60 FPS and some proper AA
They already did...
To think, they spent all that money and time focusing their xbox strategy around something that is completely irrelevant now. And lost so much good will among gamers because of it.
Should have listened to the core when it was revealed who said Kinect would never work for games and they just wanted some more regular 1st and 2nd party exclusives.
The most Kinect ever was on xone was an expensive voice control device. They ...
I bought mine because it was more powerful for less money. 99% of the best games are multiplats which would look/run better, PSN plus seemed like a better service, and Sony has a proven track record for investing in exclusives throughout the entire generation.
Also, really didn't like how MS abandoned the core 360 gamer chasing after casuals with it's complete focus on kinect....particularly after RROD was so fresh in my mind. It destroyed any remaining good will I ...
I agree that nothing about the gameplay looks innovative but if it's well executed then it could be fun. I guess the author really doesn't like 3rd person cover shooters.
Most genre's are lacking in gameplay innovation with most of the games within playing similarly, particularly FPS and 3PS
Many times those open ended player controlled stories are more disjointed, full of plot holes, and much less impactful than the more linear ones.
EA must have the worst net coders in the industry.
They had two years to build the code but still couldn't figure it out...wow.
Not in terms of games library. PS4 already has a much larger variety of games.
Your making fun of someone's name because it's different????
You sir succeed in being a complete ignorant ahole.
All I think about Crytek is how they never fixed the grain glitch in Crysis 2 for 360. Ruined what could have been a very exciting game,
I fell in love with them then grew to hate them with that game. All their games have been bad afterwards anyways so I not missing much.
I'd prefer they lower both version's resolution to increase frame rate to 60 FPS. Gamers are obsessed with the wrong thing, they should be obsessed with performance...
900p at 60 FPS is soooo much clearer in motion. 1080p at 30FPS is blurry when you move the camera.
Pre-order cancelled...seriously. EASHL is the only reason I buy the game.
I'm cancelling my pre-order. That's my most important feature.
Can't complain about more apps but many are just better on your computer.
There are more amazing multiplatform games that amazing exclusives.
Wasn't the game originally made for PC first...
I'd much rather prefer a 900p game with a stable 60 fps then a 1080p with an unstable framerate.
For most people sitting 6-8 feet away from their TV, 900p to 1080p won't be that noticeable. But a lower framerate or unstable one would be very noticeable.
Well the 40 million people that already bought the game may not be as excited for a next gen version in 2015 when all the real next gen games are releasing.
This year has very few big releases, I'd gladly replay gta5 this fall. Next year I'll be playing games I haven't played before.
The time it takes to be able to use the system is faster from completely off than from standby. View the article...
In other words, the boot time is slower on standby. That's ridiculous.
I love my ps4 but you'd have to be a completely blind fanboy not to want a real standby mode...as promised.
It's a $400 dollar box devs should make the games 720p with 60 FPS