@3.10
No, but ideally quality = sales. Gran Turismo (as well as the whole Playstation brand) is a pretty damn good indicator of that.
And is this person REALLY complaining about low end cars performing worse than high end cars? In a driving simulator?
A review should be unbiased. This person clearly LOVED this game just because it was easier than Guitar Hero and that he loved the Beatles.
I don't see any FEASIBLE way to argue that this review was not bad. Except if you say "At least he tried, what have you done." That's the only one, and even that is weak.
I'm sure he means "druggy" as "trippy."
My point is that people can use any word they want without having to censor themselves based on YOUR precious feelings.
You are trying to censor someone because of YOUR problem with some letters that happen to mean a word.
Free speech used to express distaste is far better than free speech used to hold back free speech, commie.
Does it need to be a competition?
I really don't think it does.
Yeah, look up Eyepet. That thing can dodge an orange that you roll at it.
You do know that "they" think the exact same way as you do? Like word for word, but switch the company and brand names.
Unless we import.
I like these stories because the comment section ends up having fun discussions about all of the possibilities. To be absolutely clear: it's fun.
Your post is the exception, though, imo.
^ Different words have different connotations. For me "cunt" would be worse than "whore."
Besides, let people use their own vocabulary. Free speech motha ****a.
@1.14
100% of the time though? Yeah, it can be explained realistically, but it's not realistic, in my eyes.
When that character is the lead in the Halo franchise, yes.
Wipeout used to be more flashy. That was apparently bad for the epileptics. It wasn't "too realistic" or something like that.
Yeah, this type of stuff has potential.
3D porn?
Why not just having sex?
Video games can't be "done" in real life like that (or else I'd be in a hover craft RIGHT now).
@2.1
I heard from SONY's Director of Rumor Confirmation that I shouldn't believe everything I hear on the internet.
WWI started like that, you know.
I'll admit that I didn't want motion control when i saw the Wii. I saw worse graphics, less power, and I didn't see 1:1 controls. Suffice it to say, I wasn't very happy with that direction.
SONY has simply showed me the potential. When they tickled the chin of that skeleton on screen I was sold. I want control, not waggle.
Natal, I don't know about. I like having a controller. I can't imagine playing Natal and enjoying myself, but I haven't seen enough from it yet. ...
Pro 360 sites should focus on 360 pros. Not PS3 cons (no matter the quality of the journalism).
That's how I'd run a site, at least.
Life isn't fair.
Besides, 1 year from now you'll all forget about all of the exclusive stuff. You'll move on to bigger and better games.
Do you want your memories to be of hate, protest, and crying; or do you want your memories to be of fun and good times, despite being "held back" by some extra maps? I know what my choice is.
I wouldn't be. I don't like this guy's design. Looks TERRIBLY uninspired to me.